what me, worry?;116621 wrote:I hold ratesetter and zopa accounts and have done for a number of years. Zopa have tightened up on who they lend to and have put in ever stricter criteria. (Tick). Ratesetter have halved interest rates paid to lenders so that they have a fund to pay on non collectable debts. I Need to investigate more on what that means and if I have the correct understanding, but if it means what I think then I am not very happy. Will report back in due course
People have always bought what they could not/ cannot afford thats a fact. I am of the generation that remembers the days of the " catalogues" and the " its only so much weekly" attitude (even then it scared me how much people didnt understand interest rates/money). The cost of using that system was astronomical but people still used it as it was "only X a week" .
With regard to P2P generally, I would prefer to see that being facilitated in the mainstream and regulated along with provi and credit unions.
The only alternative for many is the loan shark and that is by the worst of all worlds by a long long way. Now that really does need to be stamped out.
Yes, I do like Zopa and have been with them since the 2008 crisis.
I think that like gambling casino's some P2P have better risk management systems than banks.
And yes, this week they have frozen loan repayments for a period. They are not stupid and know that it would be a worse outcome for all if people actually fold for good. I can go with that notion but I wonder how many borrowers are actually as poor as they make out.