D Bergman;187532 wrote:mark spurrier;187530 wrote:Two things
I think it needs to be your home for a year
Second, I paid £51,748 tax last year. Why should you be different?
Thank you Mark - you got this in just as I was wondering if to wade in & comment along the same lines.
Some posters seem to be assuming it's sort of OK if you can get away with it - I doubt AF would have casually said (with no disapproval) that he knew someone who was a thief.
As for the statement that people with BTL properties don't know about CGT or self assessment - I knew people who said that, ignoring the fact that they had been told several times about their tax liabilities. They just used their so-called ignorance to protest their innocence.
And none of this is tax avoidance, it is evasion and is actually theft.
My experience with HMRC has been that ignorance usually leads to paying too much tax and, they won't do anything to make sure you pay the right amount e.g. they won't mention offsetting allowances.
Self assessment was introduced in the 1996/7 tax year. You might as well claim you didn't know that Income Tax had to be paid.
If you have held a property for a number of years, surely there must be enough equity in it to pay the tax bill?
Sorry to seem unsympathetic but I really struggle with anyone not knowing about SA (which has direct questions on BTL) after it has only been around for 25 years.
This sits with close friends of mine who I worked with as an IT contractor who paid virtually no tax for 20 years and now being asked by HMRC to pay up. I think HMRC are wrong in what they are doing - retrospective rule changes etc but we all knew that funneling $$ via a Cayman Islands Trust, taking a loan from that Trust and then defaulting on the repayments was pretty obviously "income" and, the transactions were engaged in purely for tax purposes. At least my friend isn't claiming ignorance. :)