Aminatidi;201685 wrote:It's odd wording though.
I mean if they've exited it why is it undisclosed?
I might get it if they were still selling down but if it's been sold?
The position sold will very likely be the previously undisclosed name referred to in their October factsheet. Since the full position was never acquired, the name has never been revealed.
Revealing it now would serve no beneficial purpose to the fund. For example, FS may wish to return to the position should the factors which have caused them to exit it change sometime in the future.
The reason for disposing of a position that was still being built will probably be because of some change occurring that materially/significantly impacted the future attractiveness of the holding, eg.
1) A rapid and significant upward re-rating of the share price that materially impacted future likely returns (valuation)
2) Details (such as financial statements) newly becoming available that materially affects the fundamental basis for the investment (fundamentals)
3) New information which brings into question the managements' credentials as long term stewards of capital (subjective quality factors)
4) etc
ie, almost certainly the reason will be:
“When the facts change, I change my mind. What do you do, sir?”