Funds Insider - Opening the door to funds

Welcome to the Citywire Funds Insider Forums, where members share investment ideas and discuss everything to do with their money.

You'll need to log in or set up an account to start new discussions or reply to existing ones. See you inside!

Notification

Icon
Error
Pershing Square Holdings (PSH)
+ Reply to discussion
Options
Robin
Posted: 30 March 2022 10:00:25(UTC)
#192

Joined: 06/07/2009(UTC)
Posts: 1,281

Thanks: 5343 times
Was thanked: 3730 time(s) in 1023 post(s)
I'm in two minds on this - having recently sold out. It seems a heady % fee to pay for a relatively small number of holdings and some insurance policies. Take away the bet made before Covid (how many opportunities will there be for similar pay offs in the future?) and it hasn't done a lot special in the last 18months, notwithstanding the clever talk. Indeed prior to Covid it was nothing special on the charts compared to say VWRL. Am I missing a trick as a longer term prospect? Happy to be convinced either way!
Back to top Quote
1 user thanked Robin for this post.
Mr GL on 30/03/2022(UTC)
Old Jock
Posted: 30 March 2022 10:01:38(UTC)
#194

Joined: 04/06/2018(UTC)
Posts: 382

Thanks: 564 times
Was thanked: 1157 time(s) in 313 post(s)
Small correction to what I said above, it looks like the dividend doesn't decrease in future years. Looks even better in other words.

Also pleased to see the inflation/interest rate hedge is back on.
Back to top Quote
1 user thanked Old Jock for this post.
Mr GL on 30/03/2022(UTC)
Mr GL
Posted: 30 March 2022 11:05:12(UTC)
#193

Joined: 18/10/2020(UTC)
Posts: 5,129

Thanks: 6763 times
Was thanked: 17969 time(s) in 4238 post(s)
Robin;215993 wrote:
I'm in two minds on this - having recently sold out. It seems a heady % fee to pay for a relatively small number of holdings and some insurance policies. Take away the bet made before Covid (how many opportunities will there be for similar pay offs in the future?) and it hasn't done a lot special in the last 18months, notwithstanding the clever talk. Indeed prior to Covid it was nothing special on the charts compared to say VWRL. Am I missing a trick as a longer term prospect? Happy to be convinced either way!


currently its on a 33% discount - SP -2945p

PSH NAV per share as of close of business on 29 March 2022 was 57.49 USD /43.89 GBP and year-to-date performance was 0.5%.

since pre COVID Dec /2019 it is up by 102% - ie share price has doubled... reading the annual report he has again - via shorts / options on interest rates - has made a chunk of money this year insulating his mark to market losses on equities...

I just added on the 33% discount

Pershing Square PSH Global Value 3.2%

EDIT****
added... done. Pershing Square PSH Global Value 5.1%
Back to top Quote
 |  Edit by user
1 user thanked Mr GL for this post.
Robin on 30/03/2022(UTC)
Old Jock
Posted: 30 March 2022 11:41:23(UTC)
#195

Joined: 04/06/2018(UTC)
Posts: 382

Thanks: 564 times
Was thanked: 1157 time(s) in 313 post(s)
Robin, if it helps your decision, I do not see any link myself between management fee and number of holdings.

In fact, I would tend to say the higher the number of holdings the lower the conviction level from the manager, and the lower the chance of outperformance. If you have 100 holdings it's more likely you end up with a closet tracker.

And it's probably harder to narrow an investment universe down to just 10 stocks, and just pick what you hope is the cream of the crop. In other words, it's less work for a manager to cop out and just buy everything, and the hard work is narrowing it down.

Or to put it another way, do you prefer to have some investment in say, the manager's 31st best investment idea, or his 100th best suggestion. I would far rather have the firepower concentrated in the top 10 or so that he expects will significantly outperform.

I would also say its not just a bit of insurance, it's very punchy macro bets, that you don't get in any other investment vehicle.

It's horses for courses though I agree, and this isn't everyone's cup of tea, but for me it ticks the right boxes.
Back to top Quote
 |  Edit by user
3 users thanked Old Jock for this post.
Guest on 30/03/2022(UTC), Raj K on 30/03/2022(UTC), Robin on 30/03/2022(UTC)
Big boy
Posted: 30 March 2022 12:00:54(UTC)
#197

Joined: 20/01/2015(UTC)
Posts: 6,685

Thanks: 5672 times
Was thanked: 11113 time(s) in 4253 post(s)
Old Jock;216015 wrote:
Robin, if it helps your decision, I do not see any link myself between management fee and number of holdings.

In fact, I would tend to say the higher the number of holdings the lower the conviction level from the manager, and the lower the chance of outperformance. If you have 100 holdings it's more likely you end up with a closet tracker.

And it's probably harder to narrow an investment universe down to just 10 stocks, and just pick what you hope is the cream of the crop. In other words, it's less work for a manager to cop out and just buy everything, and the hard work is narrowing it down.

Or to put it another way, do you prefer to have some investment in say, the manager's 31st best investment idea, or his 100th best suggestion. I would far rather have the firepower concentrated in the top 10 or so that he expects will significantly outperform.

I would also say its not just a bit of insurance, it's very punchy macro bets, that you don't get in any other investment vehicle.

It's horses for courses though I agree, and this isn't everyone's cup of tea, but for me it ticks the right boxes.


Based on personal experience I would much prefer the 100 share route. If using the 10 share route you have to be ultra safe and therefor finish up with yesterdays stocks. It the smaller stocks that you will tend to find the better growth. This is one of the reasons I have for running a portfolio with say a thousand or more holdings. Trackers are based on the past and I prefer to invest to-day for to-morrow.

edit for the record I am overweigh PSH with 3000 shares...
Back to top Quote
 |  Edit by user
4 users thanked Big boy for this post.
Old Jock on 30/03/2022(UTC), Robin on 30/03/2022(UTC), Alfa 2 on 30/03/2022(UTC), Harry Trout on 21/04/2022(UTC)
Raj K
Posted: 30 March 2022 12:16:23(UTC)
#196

Joined: 22/04/2016(UTC)
Posts: 2,819

Thanks: 6461 times
Was thanked: 6656 time(s) in 2091 post(s)
Old Jock;216015 wrote:
Robin, if it helps your decision, I do not see any link myself between management fee and number of holdings.

In fact, I would tend to say the higher the number of holdings the lower the conviction level from the manager, and the lower the chance of outperformance. If you have 100 holdings it's more likely you end up with a closet tracker.

And it's probably harder to narrow an investment universe down to just 10 stocks, and just pick what you hope is the cream of the crop. In other words, it's less work for a manager to cop out and just buy everything, and the hard work is narrowing it down.

Or to put it another way, do you prefer to have some investment in say, the manager's 31st best investment idea, or his 100th best suggestion. I would far rather have the firepower concentrated in the top 10 or so that he expects will significantly outperform.

I would also say its not just a bit of insurance, it's very punchy macro bets, that you don't get in any other investment vehicle.

It's horses for courses though I agree, and this isn't everyone's cup of tea, but for me it ticks the right boxes.


Also when you have only 10 companies you can keep an eye on them properly. With the quiet active engagement that PSCM carry out i would be more confident that they can identify and encourage value creation. Never understood how any manager can select 100 companies within their fund and keep on top of all of them etc. Seems to be a good strategy for uber growth like in EWI as you know many holdings will be duffers but for true hardcore investing concntrated is better (in my opinion). As private investors we can always diversify amongst multiple concentrated funds so in effect we are spreading the risk that way.
Back to top Quote
 |  Edit by user
3 users thanked Raj K for this post.
Old Jock on 30/03/2022(UTC), Robin on 30/03/2022(UTC), Richard Lambert on 30/03/2022(UTC)
Johan De Silva
Posted: 30 March 2022 12:45:15(UTC)
#198

Joined: 22/07/2019(UTC)
Posts: 4,416
10 companies eh. Imagine if all these smart fund managers put all their efforts into something to help progress humanity rather than spending time making bets and monitoring 10 companies.
Back to top Quote
 |  Edit by user
Old Jock
Posted: 30 March 2022 12:53:38(UTC)
#200

Joined: 04/06/2018(UTC)
Posts: 382

Thanks: 564 times
Was thanked: 1157 time(s) in 313 post(s)
Capitalism does help humanity ultimately, at least based on historical evidence, if you compare capitalist countries with communist ones, in terms of technological advancement and lifting people out of poverty.

It's not perfect, but its the least worst economic system.
Back to top Quote
1 user thanked Old Jock for this post.
Guest on 31/03/2022(UTC)
Bulldog Drummond
Posted: 30 March 2022 13:14:07(UTC)
#201

Joined: 03/10/2017(UTC)
Posts: 6,253

Thanks: 2935 times
Was thanked: 11838 time(s) in 4405 post(s)
Old Jock;216030 wrote:
Capitalism does help humanity ultimately, at least based on historical evidence, if you compare capitalist countries with communist ones, in terms of technological advancement and lifting people out of poverty.

It's not perfect, but its the least worst economic system.

The old joke is that capitalism produces goods whereas communism produces bads, i.e. the value of the finished product is worth less than the resources used to make it. Capitalism has certainly improved beyond compare the quality of life for the ordinary man.
Back to top Quote
 |  Edit by user
2 users thanked Bulldog Drummond for this post.
Old Jock on 30/03/2022(UTC), Guest on 31/03/2022(UTC)
Richard Lambert
Posted: 30 March 2022 14:17:50(UTC)
#199

Joined: 17/08/2010(UTC)
Posts: 49

Thanks: 73 times
Was thanked: 82 time(s) in 31 post(s)
Johan De Silva;216029 wrote:
10 companies eh. Imagine if all these smart fund managers put all their efforts into something to help progress humanity rather than spending time making bets and monitoring 10 companies.

Eh ???
Back to top Quote
1 user thanked Richard Lambert for this post.
Guest on 31/03/2022(UTC)
68 Pages«Previous page1819202122Next page»
+ Reply to discussion

Markets

Other markets