Funds Insider - Opening the door to funds

Welcome to the Citywire Funds Insider Forums, where members share investment ideas and discuss everything to do with their money.

You'll need to log in or set up an account to start new discussions or reply to existing ones. See you inside!

Notification

Icon
Error

Climate Change - The Agenda
Easyrider
Posted: 13 August 2022 09:55:28(UTC)
#60

Joined: 09/11/2020(UTC)
Posts: 1,951

Thanks: 3499 times
Was thanked: 2612 time(s) in 1147 post(s)
bédé;234478 wrote:
Easyrider;234367 wrote:
elderly people like me who still think in F, stones and pounds and use a cheque book.

I was taught about the Réaurmur scale. The only time I ever needed it was to read "War and Peace". Although, being Russia, most of the action occurred when the ºR and ºC were near enough to the same.

I like my measues to be logical and also have a human scale. Not often coincidental.

I like inches, feet, furlongs, acres and pints. But also accept centilitres. My own weight I now follow in kg, but babies still come in lbs & oz. Oil in gallons (US gallons) is just plain ridiculous. In Teesside it was alwayse tonnes.

I recently had to call out a plumber. His card reader couldn't get a signal (darkest Surrey). He would not take a cheque. Between us, my wife and I were able to cobble together some cash, which with a small discount he was able to accept provided we didn't tell Check-a-Trade.



>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

The revenue will be on to you!
1 user thanked Easyrider for this post.
bédé on 13/08/2022(UTC)
bédé
Posted: 13 August 2022 10:37:31(UTC)
#61

Joined: 26/09/2018(UTC)
Posts: 7,895

Easyrider;234483 wrote:
The revenue will be on to you!

The discount had no relationship to VAT, and I am sure he will declare everything to HMRC. He was more concerned about breaking the C-a-T rules.
bédé
Posted: 13 August 2022 10:55:47(UTC)
#86

Joined: 26/09/2018(UTC)
Posts: 7,895

Whilst mentioning Russia, I was reminded of a story that I must get off my chest:

Waaaay back, I was attending a lecture by Prof. Hume-Rothery. He told a story about UK manufactured organ pipes that fell apart after one year in Siberia. The explanation was that tin undergoes a phase change at -40º. Trained to be critical and precise, we all shouted, “what units?” Being completely deaf from birth, he didn’t hear, but had set us up and was prepared. -40 degrees is the same in ºC and ºF.

Worth knowing. It leads to an alternative calculation for conversion should you be stuck without electronic aids. Easier both mathematically and memory-load. If you are interested, you probably have the ability to work it out for yourself.

ANDREW FOSTER
Posted: 13 August 2022 11:06:28(UTC)
#87

Joined: 23/07/2019(UTC)
Posts: 8,144

Thanks: 11394 times
Was thanked: 18283 time(s) in 5998 post(s)
I like to do a bit of lateral reading, and one thing that we can all agree on is that the earth has gone through multiple periods of Ice Ages alternating with warmer periods, and that these occurred pre-industrialisation.

The last time ice was flowing down my local High Street was a mere 16,000 years ago, the mere blink of an eye in geological time.

The warm periods are known as "Greenhouse Earth" periods, here are some snippets from the "science" that are food for thought.

Quote:
There are several theories as to how a greenhouse Earth can come about. Geologic climate proxies indicate that there is a strong correlation between a greenhouse state and high CO2 levels. However, it is important to recognize that high CO2 levels are interpreted as an indicator of Earth's climate, rather than as an independent driver.


Which ties in rather well with BD's comments. We are currently told clearly that CO2 is a driver. Here the science says it's an indicator. That is highly significant. The cause and effect are reversed.

Then this:-

Quote:
Methane, the main component of natural gas, is responsible for more than a quarter of the current global warming. It's a formidable pollutant with an 80-fold higher global warming potential than CO2


That is massive. Mankind isn't releasing Methane, most of it is comes from Volcanoes (though some from cows apparently and also from melting of permafrost regions )

The IPCC also stated this in 2009:

Quote:
For instance, a “runaway greenhouse effect”—analogous to Venus-- appears to have virtually no chance of being induced by anthropogenic activities


Again that seems to have been changed and we are now told runaway climate change is certain unless we "do something" about the CO2, which it seems is an indicator not a driver.. Hmmmm

Source; https://web.archive.org/...ings/session31/inf3.pdf

Finally for now:

Quote:
Earth is now in a clement interglacial period that started approximately 11,800 years ago. Earth will likely phase into another interglacial period such as the Eemian, which occurred between 130,000 and 115,000 years ago, during which evidence of forest in North Cape, Norway, and hippopotamus in the Rhine and Thames Rivers can be observed.


So, we are heading for a very warm period. Isn't that what we are actually seeing right now maybe?

These aren't whacky "conspiracy" claims. The IPCC is a respected scientific source. But the more you read the more theoretical the evidence becomes.

Then crucially one starts to realise that the media narrative is being selective about what it highlights and not giving the full spectrum of scientific viewpoints in order to create a narrative of fear and change behaviour. The green industry, everything from Solar to EVs to Wind Energy NEEDS this narrative to get investment and succeed.
8 users thanked ANDREW FOSTER for this post.
Bulldog Drummond on 13/08/2022(UTC), NoMoreKickingCans on 13/08/2022(UTC), John Strom IV on 13/08/2022(UTC), bédé on 14/08/2022(UTC), Martina on 14/08/2022(UTC), Nigel Harris on 14/08/2022(UTC), OmegaMale on 15/08/2022(UTC), john brace on 29/10/2022(UTC)
John Strom IV
Posted: 14 August 2022 07:40:12(UTC)
#88

Joined: 18/03/2022(UTC)
Posts: 336

Thanks: 487 times
Was thanked: 551 time(s) in 243 post(s)
^^ Part of the problem is that the IPCC's scientific report, which is more measured in its language, gets translated by non scientists into the IPCC report for policy makers, which is, naturally, far more dumbed down, but also biased. This is something that various scientific contributors to the technical reports have complained about.
4 users thanked John Strom IV for this post.
NoMoreKickingCans on 14/08/2022(UTC), Easyrider on 14/08/2022(UTC), Nigel Harris on 14/08/2022(UTC), ANDREW FOSTER on 14/08/2022(UTC)
bédé
Posted: 14 August 2022 08:07:57(UTC)
#90

Joined: 26/09/2018(UTC)
Posts: 7,895

It was well to include the phrase "the agenda" in the discussion title.

There are many agendas: left-wing disruptors, veganists, worryists, science knockers .. to name a few.

NMKC is well-known from earlier posts to have his own agenda(s).
Easyrider
Posted: 14 August 2022 08:49:29(UTC)
#91

Joined: 09/11/2020(UTC)
Posts: 1,951

Thanks: 3499 times
Was thanked: 2612 time(s) in 1147 post(s)
According to The Times yesterday we should double our intake of protein and do light weight-training twice a year in order to avoid sarcopenia.
Apparently, the official guidelines on protein intake are out of date.
Increasing protein intake could pose a challenge in the context of climate change.
Easyrider
Posted: 14 August 2022 08:54:04(UTC)
#89

Joined: 09/11/2020(UTC)
Posts: 1,951

Thanks: 3499 times
Was thanked: 2612 time(s) in 1147 post(s)
John Strom IV;234585 wrote:
^^ Part of the problem is that the IPCC's scientific report, which is more measured in its language, gets translated by non scientists into the IPCC report for policy makers, which is, naturally, far more dumbed down, but also biased. This is something that various scientific contributors to the technical reports have complained about.


<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<,,,,

I suspect it's also because journalists may not fullly understand the scientific report and they may also search for an angle which they think may make it interesting to their readers. The result can be simplification to the point of nonsense.
4 users thanked Easyrider for this post.
John Strom IV on 14/08/2022(UTC), Nigel Harris on 14/08/2022(UTC), NoMoreKickingCans on 14/08/2022(UTC), Peter59 on 15/08/2022(UTC)
Easyrider
Posted: 14 August 2022 08:56:59(UTC)
#79

Joined: 09/11/2020(UTC)
Posts: 1,951

Thanks: 3499 times
Was thanked: 2612 time(s) in 1147 post(s)
Gary Millar;234380 wrote:
Bulldog Drummond;234370 wrote:
ANDREW FOSTER;234369 wrote:

Still waiting for the Ice Age that science promised us in the late 70's ...

Yes, I remember that one. Also the holes in the ozone layer that were going to exterminate us.


Every country in the world adopted and ratified the Vienna Convention for the Protection of the Ozone Layer. 99% of ozone depleting substances were phased out as the result. The holes in the ozone layer have to a large extent been fixed.

A good example of following the science.


>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Post of the year, IMHO.
bédé
Posted: 14 August 2022 10:33:56(UTC)
#92

Joined: 26/09/2018(UTC)
Posts: 7,895

Easyrider;234602 wrote:
1. According to The Times yesterday we should double our intake of protein and 2. do light weight-training twice a year in order to avoid sarcopenia.
3. increasing protein intake could pose a challenge in the context of climate change.

1. I don;t know what the old recommendation was.
2. " Light," and "twice a year". I should be able to manage that.
3. Although I enjoy eating animal products, there is a fair amount od protein in vegetables.

PS. My runner beans are not setting very well. Also, today it was too hot to pick the few. With hand watering there may soon be even less/?fewer.
64 Pages«Previous page7891011Next page»
+ Reply to discussion

Markets

Other markets