boobo zonga;329873 wrote:It seems to be generally recommended that the closer you get to retirement to hold a higher percentage in bonds than equities.Is this still current thinking? I know its futile to try and time the markets,i think i was just unlucky five years ago and also M&G Macro seems to be one of the worst performers in its sector. Maybe i should look at some bond etfs or lifestrategey. (Am becoming a bigger fan of etf’s generally,rather than rely on star managers limited shelf life).
You need to go and learn what bonds are and how they work. You're not alone – most here don't have a clue.
Bonds are not things you need to bet on. They're just an agreement. You lend money for a fixed term (2 years, 10 years..), they pay you a set income over this period, then give you your cash back ... So you do need them in a retirement portfolio, because they're the only investments that give you any certainty.
When you put bonds in a fund or ETF, it confuses people, because people focus more on price performance. But really it's just a ladder of fixed term investments. When a quality bond fund falls 50%, it's just become twice as good value. So if you wanted to own it before, you should want to own it twice as much now. If that's not the case: get on Bogleheads and learn about bonds.