Big boy;330314 wrote:
IMO a very high risk set up and shows signs of inexperience. I feel sure that a Professional would not be supportive.. Sorry to be rather harsh but have seen many great ideas fail.
That's perfectly all right, Big Boy - different opinions to be expected and I shan't be offended if this set-up doesn't have the support of a "Professional."
I don't believe the industry has caught up with people's raised expectations of a personal pension after the Pension Freedoms Acts. So the legacy support its experienced Professionals offers still tends to be a comfortable glidepath to zero. If that is the journey's end Alan-T wants - and I don't think it is - he won't lack assistance.
It's hardly a "great idea" but I wouldn't call it particularly "high risk" either. I don't see those mega caps collapsing. They may well evolve into stable dividend paying stocks, META and GOOGL started paying quarterly dividends last year. Yields are tiny, but not if you bought in to the stock ten years ago.
Of course, there is always the risk of drawdown exacerbating the damage of a sequence of poor returns but Alan-T does have three years' emergency cash should a break be needed. People feel losses more than gains. The industry knows it hence the benefit of a good sequence of returns is underplayed imho. Put it this way, had Alan-T had made different choices three years ago, he wouldn't be apprehensive now.
Having said all that, I should hate to see Mr and Mrs T embark on any course that makes them unhappy.
That would defeat the object of the exercise and being happy is far more important than being rich.
Best of luck!