Funds Insider - Opening the door to funds

Welcome to the Citywire Funds Insider Forums, where members share investment ideas and discuss everything to do with their money.

You'll need to log in or set up an account to start new discussions or reply to existing ones. See you inside!

Notification

Icon
Error

Nice guys come last. Information disclosures on financial products have next to no effect..
Jeremy Bosk
Posted: 31 July 2010 15:38:30(UTC)
#1

Joined: 09/06/2010(UTC)
Posts: 1,316

IZA DP No. 5060

David de Meza, Bernd Irlenbusch, Diane Reyniers:

Disclosure, Trust and Persuasion in Insurance Markets

Abstract:
This high-stakes experiment investigates the effect on buyers of mandatory disclosures concerning an insurance policy's value for money (the claims ratio) and the seller's commission. These information disclosures have virtually no effect despite most buyers claiming to value such information. Instead, our data reveal that whether the subject is generally trusting plays an important role. Trust is clearly associated with greater willingness to pay for insurance. Unlike in previous work, trust in our setting is not about obligations being fulfilled. The contract is complete, simple and the possibility of breach is negligible. However, as for much B2C insurance marketing, face-to-face selling plays a crucial role in our experimental design. Trusting buyers are more suggestible, so take advice more readily and buy more insurance, although they are no more risk averse than the uninsured. Moreover, trusting buyers feel less pressured by sellers, and are more confident in their decisions which suggests that they are easier to persuade. Therefore, in markets where persuasion is important, public policy designed to increase consumer information is likely to be ineffective.

http://ftp.iza.org/dp5060.pdf
Rich Harris (Citywire)
Posted: 03 August 2010 10:04:28(UTC)
#2

Joined: 08/06/2010(UTC)
Posts: 126

What I find really interesting about this is that it was commissioned and funded by the FSA. That would be the same FSA whose approach to regulation seems mainly to involve reams of unreadable 'key features documents' and the words 'caveat emptor'.

Are they finally waking up? Here's a great passage from the study:

According to conventional economic analysis, the question does not require much investigation. Individuals take optimal Bayesian decisions. The provision of extra relevant information improves decisions ... In contrast, much research in psychology and more recently in behavioral economics challenges the idea that more information is always better.

So regulators and policymakers are finally realising what the rest of us have always known. The question is, will they take their own advice?
David Johnstone
Posted: 03 August 2010 12:46:51(UTC)
#3

Joined: 03/07/2009(UTC)
Posts: 28

WIthin personal financial planning over the last 10 years or so the FSA has fixated on process and not quality. The process has included providing far more written information to a client than before via Initial Disclosure Documents which focuses on price and Key Features documentation which focuses on technical info. To date the FSA has in my opinion done nothing that concentrates on the quality of advice. Begs the question, is that because the FSA doesn't see quality of advice as being important? Pity it has taken the FSA such a long time to realise that simply throwing lots of information at a client isn't the way to do it as the above research shows. The FSA has come to the end of the road, here's hoping Hector Sants isn't allowed to continue their nonsensical ethos over at the BoE.
+ Reply to discussion

Markets

Other markets