Funds Insider - Opening the door to funds

Welcome to the Citywire Funds Insider Forums, where members share investment ideas and discuss everything to do with their money.

You'll need to log in or set up an account to start new discussions or reply to existing ones. See you inside!

Notification

Icon
Error

Banks should be worried about the return of NS&I index-linked bonds
Rich Harris (Citywire)
Posted: 11 April 2011 12:10:28(UTC)
#1

Joined: 08/06/2010(UTC)
Posts: 126

Savers may have jumped for joy upon hearing National Savings & Investments (NS&I) inflation-linked bonds will be put back on the market this year, but it seems some banks and building societies are less than impressed with the news.

Fears over increasing inflation have created a huge demand for index linked savings products on the high street – especially after NS&I withdrew its index-linked savings certificates last July.

According to an article in The Times, banks and buildings societies are now worried that the return of the popular NS&I inflation-linked bonds will essentially steal all their business and are preparing to lobby the Treasury to that effect.

Graham Beale, chief executive of the Nationwide — Britain’s biggest building society — told The Times that the impact could be enormous and cautioned the state-owned institution not to repeat a previous sales blitz two years ago which, he said, ‘sucked all the liquidity out of the system’.

According to The Times: He warned that a sudden shift of savings from the private sector to NS&I could be particularly destabilising, pointing to very generous terms offered on NS&I one-year and two-year bonds in November 2009, which led to a flood of switchers.

Jane Platt, chief executive of NS&I, however played down the likely impact of the certificates, and said that if demand did prove to be very strong, NS&I could adjust the terms or availability of its other savings products.

And while the move may be a small kick in the teeth for the banking sector, surely anything that will encourage the banks to work harder for our business and, god forbid, offer us more competitive rates is a good thing? Isn’t that what today’s interim report from the Independent Commission on Banking is all about – improving competition? And I’m sorry but who can honestly blame savers for preferring to stash their cash in a government backed savings account given the banks’ recent history.

What do you think? Are you planning to ditch a savings product with your bank in favour of a NS&I index-linked bond? Or should the government back off and give the private sector a chance?
niblick
Posted: 11 April 2011 13:00:37(UTC)
#2

Joined: 08/07/2010(UTC)
Posts: 3

Much of the discussion on NS certificates and their apparent generous inflation beating rates ignores the most crucial factor which is that the interest is paid tax free. This makes the deal doubly attractive.What a pity for the poor banks, who will shortly be feeling just as sorry for themselves as will the Annuity providers whose monopoly on our pension pots is now also to be partly removed.
sgjhaghsdg
Posted: 11 April 2011 13:05:37(UTC)
#3

Joined: 07/01/2011(UTC)
Posts: 227

As the banks and building societies aren't actually lending money via mortgages, and HMG keep pumping free money into them, they don't actually need our money, which is why they offer such derisory interest rates. HMG OTOH need the money to keep shoring up the banks and foreign governments, and to keep paying off older debts, so they are prepared to offer good interest rates.

I wonder who will blink first?
Jack Porter
Posted: 11 April 2011 13:28:43(UTC)
#4

Joined: 02/02/2008(UTC)
Posts: 6

Interest rates will surely rise, and inflation fall. Are the NSI Bonds such a good deal??
P L
Posted: 11 April 2011 14:19:01(UTC)
#5

Joined: 10/08/2008(UTC)
Posts: 356

For any high rate tax payer (of which there seems to be more and more each year) given RPI is currently running over 5% a 1% indexed return equates to finding a 10% return elsewhere. Even if the BoE got the CPI down to 2%, the RPI will still be higher at say 2.5% so that is still 5.8% needed. That is of course assuming that a NSandI and saving account are assumed equal risk which they aren't - in which case you'd need to find a high street account paying higher than 5.8% (or 10% currently).

Definitely a good deal I think unless you're a standard rate tax payer in which case you might be able to access a better rate.

I'm for one will be withdrawing as much as I can
Stanley Spencer
Posted: 11 April 2011 15:28:11(UTC)
#6

Joined: 10/02/2010(UTC)
Posts: 8

If the banks are so worried - why dont they offer an ISA deal at rpi + 1%? - which is not over generous. I would transfer quite a few years ISA to such a deal. I suspect that the worry says more about the banks and there attitude to savers than anyone else.

stan
la mamma
Posted: 11 April 2011 15:48:28(UTC)
#7

Joined: 04/11/2010(UTC)
Posts: 2

Ah, poor banks, my heart bleeds ... Savers will go wherever the best deals are offered, common sense, human nature, obvious.
If the banks don't like it, they have only to offer better!
Curb their obscene levels of bonuses and top pay, for example, and they'd have some cash available to support their making better offers, which would then attract the funds to support loans to businesses trying to grow ...
majic
Posted: 11 April 2011 16:28:23(UTC)
#8

Joined: 11/05/2010(UTC)
Posts: 8

So Nationwide (and other lenders) feel that it is unfair if they will not be able to borrow money for next to nothing in order to increase their profits?
Well, I for one, think that it is blatantly unfair that for some two years or more Nationwide has had our meagre savings virtually free of charge, and I will not hesitate to withdraw most of those if the NS&I offering is attractive enough. As pensioners, whose interest on our savings is necessary to maintain a reasonable standard of living, we are tired of subsidising the feckless careless borrowers.
If enough lenders transfer their savings from banks and building societies, perhaps the latter will be forced to offer reasonable rates of return, regardless of whatever arbitrary rate the BoS may dictate.
Bring it on!
Jonathan
Posted: 11 April 2011 18:29:52(UTC)
#9

Joined: 09/08/2009(UTC)
Posts: 108

So the idea of NS&I is that you put money in and it doesn't actually devalue while you leave it in there? Amazing! So long as you believe the inflation figures produced by the government.
ynys
Posted: 11 April 2011 19:10:44(UTC)
#10

Joined: 21/10/2010(UTC)
Posts: 45

Who actually pays for investors to have this higher rate return?
Someone is issuing bonds at a rate unfavourable to themselves?
2 Pages12Next page
+ Reply to discussion

Markets

Other markets