Joined: 17/09/2018(UTC) Posts: 1,471
|
Joe P;283582 wrote:My thoughts on BTC as "digital money"...
To my (simple) mind, "money" has 3 functions: 1. a medium of exchange 2. a store of value (specifically non-volatile, hence we dislike heavy inflation/deflation) 3. a unit of account ("a standard measure")
As I see it, BTC fulfils none of the above in a proper way: 1. It is not easy to go and buy a pint of beer with BTC, or a week's shopping, or a car. It's a poor medium of exchange (and there are technical limitations in it's framework). However I have done all of the above painlessly with a VISA card based on GBP. 2. BTC might well go up 100% in a year, but it can also fall 50% in the same period. It's nice if you buy some and it rises, but that doesn't make it a good store of value. Trust me, if you have £1m in GBP, and I tell you to flip a coin, heads I double it, tails I take £500K, you will not play this game. 3. BTC may be a leading digital ccy right now, but there are others (with varying arguments as to their respective use-cases), and CBDCs are also on the way. However, fundamentally, I know no-one who thinks of BTC as a standard 'unit of account'.
As I see it, BTC is a speculative, volatile, deflationary, digital, asset. The deflationary side of it sounds nice, but there are strong economic arguments against a non-inflationary money supply. BTC's worth is highly debatable (and it's price movements controlled mostly by "whales"). It is mostly traded on crypto exchanges in which I have zero trust. My banks will not let me move real money in/out of said exchanges. Thus it is largely useless to me.
If you want to trade a speculative digital asset, where it's difficult to cash in gains, that's fine. Just don't pretend it's going to be the next global reserve ccy. Thank you for attending my TED talk.
The world's third-largest asset manager explains... https://www.fidelitydigi...bitcoin-first-revisited
|