Funds Insider - Opening the door to funds

Welcome to the Citywire Funds Insider Forums, where members share investment ideas and discuss everything to do with their money.

You'll need to log in or set up an account to start new discussions or reply to existing ones. See you inside!

Notification

Icon
Error

Dividends, deficits and debt … DEC results out today
Phil 2
Posted: 11 July 2024 07:33:02(UTC)

Joined: 20/07/2018(UTC)
Posts: 2,107

Thanks: 9819 times
Was thanked: 4742 time(s) in 1534 post(s)
John Bran;311475 wrote:
Update from DEC bought more assets!
I will wait to see what oakbloke says.
Let him trawl through the maths.


Here you go Bran Flake! Apologies for likely annoying formatting …

Dear reader

The opposite of accretive is dilutive. Which was it for DEC-hands?

DEC announced the acquisition of high-working interest, operated natural gas properties and related facilities in eastern Texas from Crescent Pass Energy. The deal should close in Q3.

Thanks for reading The Oak Bloke’s Substack! Subscribe for free to receive new posts and support my work.

The Acquisition will be funded through a combination of the issuance of approximately 2.4 million DEC shares ($34,512,000 at today’s share price - which is 5.07% dilution for DEC hands) as well as a senior secured bank facility partly secured on the acquired assets, along with existing and expanded liquidity from the Company's recently increased borrowing capacity ($66,500,000 expected). The net purchase price should be circa $100m total.

The purchase is a PV-20 valuation. This means this has an IRR of about 20%. People are concerned that debt is being used. But what cost is the debt meanwhile? 7.28% fixed rate in ABS VIII. What’s 20% - 7.28% reader? The answer is accretive.

How much debt headroom does DEC have? ~$130m. So in other words this is about 50% of remaining headroom and well below DEC’s limits, and was part funded by the issue of shares.

Txn Details:

Crescent Pass has current net production of 38 MMcfepd (6.3 Mboepd) and historically low annual declines of ~9%.

Production is ~92% gas with the remainder NGL/Oil

Attractively priced at $2,651 per flowing Mcfe (which is $16m per flowing MBOEPD). Interesting, too, to notice that EQT recently did a deal in April 2024 with Equinor and paid $20m per MBOEPD. So EQT paid 25% more than DEC. What’s $20m - $16m reader? The answer is accretive.

Estimated NTM EBITDA based on NY Strip Price of ~$26 million is a 3.8x purchase multiple. PDP Reserves of ~170 Bcfe (28 MMboe) with PV-10 of $155 million. What’s $155m - $100m reader? The answer is accretive.

Given its location right next to existing DEC assets there are opportunities for additional operating cost efficiencies. What has DEC proven time and again to achieve with its Smarter asset management? and what happens when you produce things more cheaply reader but still get the same revenue? Yes, accretive.

Then there is further upside in that the purchase includes ~170,000 acres of commercially attractive leasehold in both East Texas and the Freestone Trend. How many times has DEC divested land reader? The answer is three times in as many years. $180m of divestments. What is the word when you earn an extra return on something at no extra cost? Accretive.

What happens when you produce more gas in the parts of the US from which it is easier to export the gas as LNG and take advantage of Gulf Pricing? Accretive.

What happens when you realise that the 4 year strip price of $3.95 (for 2028) is a super conservative price based on recent low prices and the $155m PV10 moves back out to circa a $300m valuation at the former 10 year strip prices being used just a year or so back? After all, the EIA today spoke of 2H24 prices being $2.90 average up from $2.10/mmbtu. Accretive.

Comparing Crescent Pass to other DEC acquisitions

How does Crescent Pass compare to other acquisitions? Very favourably actually. $3.57m per MMBOE is the cheapest acquisition to date and $15.87m per MBOEPD is a little bit more than Tanos II….. but 25% cheaper than EQT’s deal with Equinor.

Analysis

$155m of PDP assets.

5% dilution on a £525m market cap (or $672m) is $33.6m “cost of dilution”.

-

$66.5m of debt at 7.28% costs $4.8m.

Depletion, depreciation & amortisation at 9% is $14m

$1.6m is estimated tax

Totals $20.4m “ITDA” taken from $26m EBITDA

1. So the deal delivers a $55m gain of assets with potential upside.

2, The deal delivers an annual estimated additional net profit per annum of around $6m

3.If shorts are 7.5% of stock 5% dilution also means 0.4% of shorts pro rata disappear

Conclusion

Some appear to have forgotten or misunderstood DEC’s strategy. Let’s recap it:

“We continuously refine the capital allocation framework in order to balance debt reduction, sustainable fixed dividends, strategic share repurchases and accretive acquisitions.”

Yes, paying down debt is important, paying dividends and supporting the buybacks too. But acquisitions too. Accretive acquisitions. The assets have been acquired at an exceptionally good price and are well-located for LNG expansion.

Look at the PDP resources DEC now has accumulated in 2024 (compared to 2020, say). Nearly 900MMBOE - and that’s after an assumed 50 MMBOE gain so far in 2024 (taking into account an estimated 50 MMBOE production.

Put another way, operations generated $410m in 2023. $100m represents less than 3 months cash flow…. where the $26m EBITDA itself boosts cash.

These simple and accretive facts seem to have not been well understood by the markets today.

Regards

The Oak Bloke
2 users thanked Phil 2 for this post.
Johan De Silva on 14/07/2024(UTC), John Bran on 21/07/2024(UTC)
John Bran
Posted: 11 July 2024 17:44:51(UTC)

Joined: 01/09/2017(UTC)
Posts: 2,125

Thanks: 1093 times
Was thanked: 1978 time(s) in 1073 post(s)
Market appears to have digested the information.
Up 5.5% today.
1 user thanked John Bran for this post.
Phil 2 on 12/07/2024(UTC)
MarkSp
Posted: 12 July 2024 15:54:34(UTC)

Joined: 02/02/2020(UTC)
Posts: 2,176

Phil 2;311541 wrote:


These simple and accretive facts seem to have not been well understood by the markets today.

Regards

The Oak Bloke


The issue with DEC is that it is really complex. Depleting assets, well capping, loans secured on assets, massive hedging gains/losses. It doesn't make it consumable.

It also looks like they are exiting UK slowly. Trade volume is now US heavy, the buy back is in London and volumes are dropping. It is also really volatile - great for a fool like me but not encouraging for an investor.
Phil 2
Posted: 13 July 2024 07:44:49(UTC)

Joined: 20/07/2018(UTC)
Posts: 2,107

Thanks: 9819 times
Was thanked: 4742 time(s) in 1534 post(s)
MarkSp;311688 wrote:
Phil 2;311541 wrote:


These simple and accretive facts seem to have not been well understood by the markets today.

Regards

The Oak Bloke


The issue with DEC is that it is really complex. Depleting assets, well capping, loans secured on assets, massive hedging gains/losses. It doesn't make it consumable.

It also looks like they are exiting UK slowly. Trade volume is now US heavy, the buy back is in London and volumes are dropping. It is also really volatile - great for a fool like me but not encouraging for an investor.


I agree on most of your points, certainly the volatility is off the scale for a 250 company at times. Where we differ is our view of the hedging gains and losses. To me they are a result of accounting rules I don’t pretend to understand. The extensive hedging effectively guarantees revenues which in turn guarantees debt repayments. Presumably a condition of the loans or a matter of prudence? What gets reported in the accounts is wild swings from huge paper profits (low gas prices, hedging profitable) to losses (high prices, so hedging recorded as an opportunity-loss).

But their sizeable / increasing revenues and cash generation sometimes get overlooked, along with their flair for acquiring new assets at good prices, cutting their operating costs and then retiring them cheaply.

I trade this now around the £5k mark … selling down from £6k or at new highs, and vice versa around £4k / dips. Not perfect but easy to manage for a bull 🐮 of little brain 🧠 … oh and the dividends (!)
MarkSp
Posted: 13 July 2024 15:02:40(UTC)

Joined: 02/02/2020(UTC)
Posts: 2,176

Phil 2;311724 wrote:
MarkSp;311688 wrote:
Phil 2;311541 wrote:


These simple and accretive facts seem to have not been well understood by the markets today.

Regards

The Oak Bloke


The issue with DEC is that it is really complex. Depleting assets, well capping, loans secured on assets, massive hedging gains/losses. It doesn't make it consumable.

It also looks like they are exiting UK slowly. Trade volume is now US heavy, the buy back is in London and volumes are dropping. It is also really volatile - great for a fool like me but not encouraging for an investor.


I agree on most of your points, certainly the volatility is off the scale for a 250 company at times. Where we differ is our view of the hedging gains and losses. To me they are a result of accounting rules I don’t pretend to understand. The extensive hedging effectively guarantees revenues which in turn guarantees debt repayments. Presumably a condition of the loans or a matter of prudence? What gets reported in the accounts is wild swings from huge paper profits (low gas prices, hedging profitable) to losses (high prices, so hedging recorded as an opportunity-loss).

But their sizeable / increasing revenues and cash generation sometimes get overlooked, along with their flair for acquiring new assets at good prices, cutting their operating costs and then retiring them cheaply.

I trade this now around the £5k mark … selling down from £6k or at new highs, and vice versa around £4k / dips. Not perfect but easy to manage for a bull 🐮 of little brain 🧠 … oh and the dividends (!)


I buy 1000 shares and recover that value when I sell.

At the moment my average price with divis 83.6 p
I understand the hedging but if you are a newbie you are seeing a company that makes a mega loss then a mega profit with a tanking SP. I wouldn't get much further than that :)
3 users thanked MarkSp for this post.
Phil 2 on 13/07/2024(UTC), what me worry? on 15/07/2024(UTC), John Bran on 16/07/2024(UTC)
John Bran
Posted: 16 July 2024 15:19:43(UTC)

Joined: 01/09/2017(UTC)
Posts: 2,125

Thanks: 1093 times
Was thanked: 1978 time(s) in 1073 post(s)
I think we may have the begining of a recovery and no I can't jinx it by posting that!!
1 user thanked John Bran for this post.
Phil 2 on 16/07/2024(UTC)
John Bran
Posted: 17 July 2024 13:15:40(UTC)

Joined: 01/09/2017(UTC)
Posts: 2,125

Thanks: 1093 times
Was thanked: 1978 time(s) in 1073 post(s)
Another day of going in the right direction. Told you I wouldn't jinx it!
John Bran
Posted: 17 July 2024 15:58:43(UTC)

Joined: 01/09/2017(UTC)
Posts: 2,125

Thanks: 1093 times
Was thanked: 1978 time(s) in 1073 post(s)
In fact 🚀
John Bran
Posted: 23 July 2024 07:15:13(UTC)

Joined: 01/09/2017(UTC)
Posts: 2,125

Thanks: 1093 times
Was thanked: 1978 time(s) in 1073 post(s)
DEC shorts. Should be up-to-date shorts
https://shorttracker.co.uk/company/GB00BQHP5P93/
John Bran
Posted: 06 August 2024 10:39:11(UTC)

Joined: 01/09/2017(UTC)
Posts: 2,125

Thanks: 1093 times
Was thanked: 1978 time(s) in 1073 post(s)
Recession....IF...
22 Pages«Previous page1112131415Next page»
+ Reply to discussion

Markets

Other markets