ANDREW FOSTER;257155 wrote:OK, correct me if I'm wrong but all 'Digital Pounds' would have a unique identifier, like individual Bitcoins.
I can't comment on how a digital pound would work because it hasn't been designed yet but I can correct you on bitcoin.
Bitcoins don't have unique identifiers; there's not even such a thing as an "individual bitcoin". Satoshi also do not have unique identifiers, it's just the system's accounting unit.
The only unique identifiers in the system are called "addresses" but they're account numbers. Being a decentralised system, you do not have to open an account with any entity, you just compute a key pair. The public key is your account number, the private key is used to sign transactions from that account.
Transactions are a list of inputs (debits) and outputs (credits), which must be digitally signed with the private keys of all input accounts and satisfy outputs >= inputs in order to be valid.
Blocks in the blockchain contain a list of these transactions. The person who computed the block includes a special transaction transferring the block reward and fees (outputs - inputs) to accounts of their choosing. Blocks also require proof that you have burned trees until you found a winning lottery ticket in the ashes to be valid.
None of this is a model for how a CBDC should work, bitcoin was designed by an anarchist.