Funds Insider - Opening the door to funds

Welcome to the Citywire Funds Insider Forums, where members share investment ideas and discuss everything to do with their money.

You'll need to log in or set up an account to start new discussions or reply to existing ones. See you inside!

Notification

Icon
Error

UFPLS - Anyone using this mechanism?
Harry Trout
Posted: 28 October 2023 15:03:17(UTC)
#16

Joined: 08/06/2014(UTC)
Posts: 1,012

Thanks: 3965 times
Was thanked: 3538 time(s) in 821 post(s)
Thanks everyone for the replies so far, very helpful

Taking points made in turn ......

Evies Dad - yes take your point about the lumpy tax deduction on the £12,570 so I might well go down the road of monthly UFPLS as others seem to be doing. Also note your point about transferring personal allowances, thank you. We both take advantage of the £2,880 annual SIPP contribution already but thank you for mentioning.

Dan L - you say that both UFPLS and an equivalent FAD could be used to achieve the outcome I want and I don't disagree. Thank you.

Andrew Foster - thanks for the warning, noted.

Busy doing nothing Thanks for the well made point which is probably a big one. My leaning is to take the tax free element in small monthly UFPLS rather than a large amount up front using FAD. I think this for now because:

(a) we don't need the cash and I don't want to trigger a tax liability on income earned in Mrs Trout's name. We fund annual ISAs from our GIAs and so a large tax free lump sum TFLS would become unwrapped and income thereon potentially taxable

(b) it feels easier to make a smaller decision if I'm honest; and

(c) given SIPP's attractive inheritance tax properties it feels psychologically better to keep the SIPP larger for longer.

Thrugelmir Thank you for the fulsome reply. I guess my objective is not to squander easy to understand tax breaks that you lose once you get into the next tax year. I agree that in the end there really are only two certainties in life - death and taxes - I am hopeful of delaying both !!!

So it would appear that there are no major real red flags thus far. It's interesting because if you google "UFPLS v Drawdown" most advisors seem pretty negative about UFPLS. Anyone any ideas why?

I will continue to research but please if anyone else has anything to add, I would be most grateful as ever.

Harry
7 users thanked Harry Trout for this post.
Jay P on 28/10/2023(UTC), Thrugelmir on 28/10/2023(UTC), Dan L on 28/10/2023(UTC), Helen L on 29/10/2023(UTC), Chalky W on 17/11/2023(UTC), D_Patrick on 09/01/2024(UTC), Carl blue nose on 18/11/2024(UTC)
Thrugelmir
Posted: 28 October 2023 15:30:05(UTC)
#17

Joined: 01/06/2012(UTC)
Posts: 5,329

Thanks: 3258 times
Was thanked: 7885 time(s) in 3267 post(s)
Harry Trout;284167 wrote:
It's interesting because if you google "UFPLS v Drawdown" most advisors seem pretty negative about UFPLS. Anyone any ideas why?



None at all. There's no right or wrong. Use a decision tree to determine what works best for you.
1 user thanked Thrugelmir for this post.
Harry Trout on 28/10/2023(UTC)
Molly M
Posted: 28 October 2023 18:35:51(UTC)
#20

Joined: 23/11/2019(UTC)
Posts: 104

Thanks: 171 times
Was thanked: 334 time(s) in 82 post(s)
One factor might be linked to the adviser’s role in planning for their client’s possible future needs and identifying risks etc. Advisers may believe the FAD route offers more flexibility and fewer restrictions.

I’m no expert, but if I’ve understood correctly, a potential disadvantage of the UFPLS route is that is triggers the Money Purchase Annual Allowance straight away. With the FAD route a client could access their 25% lump sum and the MPAA restriction would be delayed until the rest of their pension is eventually accessed, i.e., when they drawdown some of the remaining 75%

So, say a client retires 10 years early, is recommended the UFPLS route and then over the following months disaster strikes (obviously!) and the stock market drops 50%. The client might choose to return to work and may want to pay a lot of their earnings into their pension to replace their losses and buy whilst cheap etc, but would find the MPAA restricts them. Then a UFPLS client may feel they’d been badly advised, especially if they find themselves working alongside a FAD colleague, who can pay in unrestricted amounts.

I think it’s different for DIY-ers, we’re making the decision ourselves and won’t be looking for anyone else to blame!

The MPAA has been increased from £4k to £10k this year, so maybe less of a concern now anyway?
9 users thanked Molly M for this post.
SSJ on 28/10/2023(UTC), Tim D on 28/10/2023(UTC), Harry Trout on 28/10/2023(UTC), Jay P on 28/10/2023(UTC), Helen L on 29/10/2023(UTC), Newbie on 29/10/2023(UTC), kim shillinglaw on 04/12/2023(UTC), Neminem Laedit on 20/05/2024(UTC), Carl blue nose on 11/11/2024(UTC)
SSJ
Posted: 28 October 2023 19:49:26(UTC)
#18

Joined: 13/09/2010(UTC)
Posts: 512

Thanks: 1073 times
Was thanked: 1025 time(s) in 397 post(s)
Harry Trout;284167 wrote:

So it would appear that there are no major real red flags thus far. It's interesting because if you google "UFPLS v Drawdown" most advisors seem pretty negative about UFPLS. Anyone any ideas why?

I will continue to research but please if anyone else has anything to add, I would be most grateful as ever.

Harry

There is a political aspect to this, namely the recently demised LTA might well be reinstated under a Labour government, probably with their own "twist". i.e. Drawdown this year or next year will avoid* the LTA test whereas ongoing UFPLS could catch a new LTA in a couple of years time. And even if you think you're a pauper with only half a million, there is the capital growth to consider (and possibly a DB pension waiting in the wings that easily gobble up a large chunk of LTA).

*If Drawdown is initiated in 2024-25 tax year then there won't even be a record of the % LTA used, so I suspect that the current 75th birthday test against LTA couldn't be reinstated by Labour for those pensions entering drawdown in 2024-25.

As I said, it's political. However, I will be putting my money where my mouth is next April :)
3 users thanked SSJ for this post.
Harry Trout on 28/10/2023(UTC), Guest on 28/10/2023(UTC), Guest on 24/04/2024(UTC)
Thrugelmir
Posted: 28 October 2023 23:38:29(UTC)
#19

Joined: 01/06/2012(UTC)
Posts: 5,329

Thanks: 3258 times
Was thanked: 7885 time(s) in 3267 post(s)
SSJ;284198 wrote:

There is a political aspect to this, namely the recently demised LTA might well be reinstated under a Labour government,


If the floor underneath the equity markets is taken away. For many of those in DC pension schemes may not be an immediate issue anyway. Markets generally appear to have taken the interest rate rises in their stride.
1 user thanked Thrugelmir for this post.
Harry Trout on 29/10/2023(UTC)
Harry Trout
Posted: 29 October 2023 08:58:15(UTC)
#21

Joined: 08/06/2014(UTC)
Posts: 1,012

Thanks: 3965 times
Was thanked: 3538 time(s) in 821 post(s)
Molly M;284191 wrote:
One factor might be linked to the adviser’s role in planning for their client’s possible future needs and identifying risks etc. Advisers may believe the FAD route offers more flexibility and fewer restrictions.

I’m no expert, but if I’ve understood correctly, a potential disadvantage of the UFPLS route is that is triggers the Money Purchase Annual Allowance straight away. With the FAD route a client could access their 25% lump sum and the MPAA restriction would be delayed until the rest of their pension is eventually accessed, i.e., when they drawdown some of the remaining 75%

So, say a client retires 10 years early, is recommended the UFPLS route and then over the following months disaster strikes (obviously!) and the stock market drops 50%. The client might choose to return to work and may want to pay a lot of their earnings into their pension to replace their losses and buy whilst cheap etc, but would find the MPAA restricts them. Then a UFPLS client may feel they’d been badly advised, especially if they find themselves working alongside a FAD colleague, who can pay in unrestricted amounts.

I think it’s different for DIY-ers, we’re making the decision ourselves and won’t be looking for anyone else to blame!

The MPAA has been increased from £4k to £10k this year, so maybe less of a concern now anyway?

Thanks Molly, this was really helpful

I was aware of the MPAA but hadn't spotted the nuance of when it takes effect.

It has created a good discussion point in the Trout household and we are confident that, from a financial perspective, we shouldn't need to work again. Whether we might want to is another matter.

The spreadsheet model we have of our finances can illustrate the effect of a 50% drop in equities and we would be able to tough it out, partly because of our 50% equity allocation right now.

But it was a great point, thank you.

I'm gong to continue my research but the working assumption for now is that I will do monthly UFPLS of £1,396. I'm going to speak to HL tomorrow to investigate practicalities.

Happy to hear from anyone else who has any further observations, the forum is great for research like this.
3 users thanked Harry Trout for this post.
Molly M on 29/10/2023(UTC), Thrugelmir on 29/10/2023(UTC), kim shillinglaw on 04/12/2023(UTC)
Dentmaster
Posted: 29 October 2023 09:51:30(UTC)
#22

Joined: 23/01/2021(UTC)
Posts: 440

Thanks: 785 times
Was thanked: 641 time(s) in 267 post(s)
I would be going for option A in the current climate, or in any bear market. During a more normal cycle, i would probably drawdown on cash and all stocks using drawdown to keep my desired asset allocation.
I believe if you take , a very small withdrawal from your SIPP in month one, this will trigger your tax code for your platform , which should avoid a large tax bill that you need to reclaim .
2 users thanked Dentmaster for this post.
Sheerman on 29/10/2023(UTC), Carl blue nose on 18/11/2024(UTC)
Dentmaster
Posted: 29 October 2023 12:34:20(UTC)
#23

Joined: 23/01/2021(UTC)
Posts: 440

Thanks: 785 times
Was thanked: 641 time(s) in 267 post(s)
Sorry, got the two Harry"s mixed up. Gloom and Trout. Similar thread
Harry Trout
Posted: 17 November 2023 11:20:32(UTC)
#24

Joined: 08/06/2014(UTC)
Posts: 1,012

Thanks: 3965 times
Was thanked: 3538 time(s) in 821 post(s)
Thank you to everyone who has chipped in with help on this thread

Having now spoken to Hargreaves Lansdown, it appears they don't have an easy mechanism for doing monthly UFPLS so I think to get me started I'm just going to partially drawdown £20,000.

I will then set up a direct debit to send me £12,570 / 12 = £1,047.50 per month to use up the annual allowance. This will gradually erode the £15,000 remaining after the £5,000 tax free cash.

The £5,000 tax free cash will just be plonked in Active Savings over 5 years at around 5% currently. The balance remaining in drawdown earns the following interest at the moment if I just want to keep it really simple

171123 HL Interest

I'm not bothered about the lost months of this tax year, I'm just looking to get started and will review again in a year or so as I grow into it all of this and get some experience.

Really, in summary, I'm doing this to syphon off the natural yield in my SIPP each year to use up my annual allowance in to me a simple and easy to understand way (hopefully!)

Appreciate many of you will already be doing this and that it probably seems like child's play but I haven't found it easy to decide what to . Mainly because it's that feeling of "I don't know what I don't know" !!!

Across 2 phone calls, HL have been very helpful and professional I must say

Thanks again all
2 users thanked Harry Trout for this post.
Jay P on 23/11/2023(UTC), kim shillinglaw on 04/12/2023(UTC)
Harry Trout
Posted: 23 November 2023 09:12:58(UTC)
#25

Joined: 08/06/2014(UTC)
Posts: 1,012

Thanks: 3965 times
Was thanked: 3538 time(s) in 821 post(s)
A further update - I've completed my £20,000 drawdown request with Hargreaves Lansdown and they are processing it

For anyone starting to think about retirement options and tactics here is a video I found helpful when I was doing the early ground work

It's only 11 minutes long and it's good (for beginners !!)

Retirement - Drawdown vs UFPLS vs Annuity

5 users thanked Harry Trout for this post.
SF100 on 23/11/2023(UTC), Jay P on 23/11/2023(UTC), Greylocks on 01/01/2024(UTC), D_Patrick on 09/01/2024(UTC), Carl blue nose on 18/11/2024(UTC)
4 PagesPrevious page1234Next page
+ Reply to discussion

Markets

Other markets