Funds Insider - Opening the door to funds

Welcome to the Citywire Funds Insider Forums, where members share investment ideas and discuss everything to do with their money.

You'll need to log in or set up an account to start new discussions or reply to existing ones. See you inside!

Notification

Icon
Error

Capital Gains Tax on UK property return
Tim D
Posted: 18 January 2024 15:01:51(UTC)
#1

Joined: 07/06/2017(UTC)
Posts: 8,883

Thanks: 33209 times
Was thanked: 24362 time(s) in 7229 post(s)
So having - at the end of December - sold our old place that we'd been renting out for years since we bought somewhere else and moved there, I just went through the "Capital Gains Tax on UK property" process at
https://www.gov.uk/repor...n-or-after-6-april-2020

As I understand it, this was bought in because otherwise HMRC might be waiting another year until January 2025 and me doing our 2023-2024 tax returns before they got their hands on the chunky 5 figures we've each just paid (about 1/3 of the gain qualified for PRR relief - including the free 9 months - but we're exposed for the rest). But these days you have to pay it within 60 days of the sale.

Since it needs to know some stuff I cannot possibly know for sure until 2023-2024's tax return is done (income and losses for the year) I was careful to tick the "contains estimates" box. Am I right in assuming that when it comes to SA time, I'll basically need to reproduce the calculation (maybe with minor corrections/improvements) in the capital gains section (presumably showing working in an attachment) and all that this "Capital Gains Tax on UK property" thing will have done is effectively have been an advance credit to our tax accounts?

A couple of thoughts:

- When we were living in the place, we did do some spends which might have been considered "improvements" rather than just maintenance: installing a much nicer kitchen and converting the attic space (technically to a "boarded loft" rather than a bedroom). However we have absolutely no record of even memory how much we spent on those and the bank statements were shredded long ago. A shame, might have helped bump the book cost up a little but I am reluctant to guess with no evidence. Mainly mention it as a cautionary tale to others who might find themselves in a similar situation: hold onto those records even if you think you won't need them again because it's your gains-tax exempt residence at the time.

- One thing that surprised me: when the site asks for an estimate of losses, it's very clear that only losses before the exchange date can be used. A bit annoying as over the weeks after the completion I crystallized a bunch of losses (bond-heavy funds and REITs) with the express intention of offsetting the gains on the property. I assume this'll all come out in the wash at SA time (and we should get a bit of a refund as net gain will be less for the year overall when the losses are included)... or am I missing something important about fungibility of gains and losses?

Anyway, goodbye 17.6%pa compounder (before tax) over the ~26.6 years we owned it (capital value, not counting yield or benefit of living in it... although by the end the yield had become rather thin and hardly seemed worth the frequent expenses, stress and hassle involved).
3 users thanked Tim D for this post.
Guest on 18/01/2024(UTC), Rookie Investor on 18/01/2024(UTC), Jay P on 18/01/2024(UTC)
Rookie Investor
Posted: 18 January 2024 15:16:26(UTC)
#2

Joined: 09/12/2020(UTC)
Posts: 2,087

Tim D;293162 wrote:

- When we were living in the place, we did do some spends which might have been considered "improvements" rather than just maintenance: installing a much nicer kitchen and converting the attic space (technically to a "boarded loft" rather than a bedroom). However we have absolutely no record of even memory how much we spent on those and the bank statements were shredded long ago. A shame, might have helped bump the book cost up a little but I am reluctant to guess with no evidence. Mainly mention it as a cautionary tale to others who might find themselves in a similar situation: hold onto those records even if you think you won't need them again because it's your gains-tax exempt residence at the time.



Even if a new kitchen or bathroom might be though of as an improvement, it likely is just replacing old for new and would not be usually regarded as a cost for cgt purposes, rather it would be revenue expense that you could have used to reduce taxable profit.

So a replacement kitchen with newer items wouldn't usually count as a loss against capital gains. But maybe an installation of a dishwasher that wasn't there previously might. Or an extension or attic conversion as you had probably would be considered as an expense to offset against capital gains.
Rookie Investor
Posted: 18 January 2024 15:18:44(UTC)
#6

Joined: 09/12/2020(UTC)
Posts: 2,087

17.6% is an amazing return, beating stocks I think. Add in leverage and your return on equity would be even greater.

Very unlikely to repeat.

My one is sitting on a loss having bought not that long ago. But probably look to sell and use the losses to offset against cgt which I have around £50k in my portfolio to diffuse over the years.
1 user thanked Rookie Investor for this post.
Tim D on 18/01/2024(UTC)
Tim D
Posted: 18 January 2024 15:48:50(UTC)
#3

Joined: 07/06/2017(UTC)
Posts: 8,883

Thanks: 33209 times
Was thanked: 24362 time(s) in 7229 post(s)
Rookie Investor;293163 wrote:
Even if a new kitchen or bathroom might be though of as an improvement, it likely is just replacing old for new and would not be usually regarded as a cost for cgt purposes, rather it would be revenue expense that you could have used to reduce taxable profit.

So a replacement kitchen with newer items wouldn't usually count as a loss against capital gains. But maybe an installation of a dishwasher that wasn't there previously might. Or an extension or attic conversion as you had probably would be considered as an expense to offset against capital gains.


Interestingly, the gov.uk's own website for submitting this return does contain a bit of guidance on this and a "luxury kitchen" is actually one of the specific examples they included as something that'd be an improvement. (I'd go get the exact text and quote it but I don't want to open a can of worms by reopening the web form and making it think I'm resubmitting it or something.)

I don't know about "luxury" but we certainly ripped out some shonky mouldering chipboard-and-formica cabinets and worktops and replaced them with oak and granite. Of course some of the total cost of that could be seen as just getting the original kitchen back up to spec ("maintainance") and then only the added value beyond that would be "improvement". A minefield to work out some sensible numbers even if we had any paperwork.

The thing is that we did all this stuff while we were living there before we rented it out, so the question of whether it was an expense against rental income or not never arose. Certainly once we were renting the place out we claimed all expenses against income (and they were all maintenance things... we didn't do anything that could be remotely considered an improvement after we left.)
Tim D
Posted: 18 January 2024 16:01:42(UTC)
#7

Joined: 07/06/2017(UTC)
Posts: 8,883

Thanks: 33209 times
Was thanked: 24362 time(s) in 7229 post(s)
Rookie Investor;293164 wrote:
17.6% is an amazing return, beating stocks I think. Add in leverage and your return on equity would be even greater.

Very unlikely to repeat.


This is why I am quite sanguine about selling it.

Some years ago I remember reading some Sunday paper's money pages article about which year to buy property in recent decades had produced the best annualised returns subsequently. IIRC, it was sometime in the mid 1990s, which is when we bought. Cannot be coincidence that that was the last time charts of "affordability" show any sort of dip, presumably after the 1980s excesses and "negative equity" bust had reset things a bit.
1 user thanked Tim D for this post.
Rookie Investor on 18/01/2024(UTC)
Newbie
Posted: 18 January 2024 16:52:31(UTC)
#10

Joined: 31/01/2012(UTC)
Posts: 3,818

Despite some headaches "physical" property (in the form of a proper house) in a half decent area has not been bad investments for many. Flats and leaseholds not so much.
In my current home (where I live) it has achieved 3x in 16 years.

I bought a BTL in 2005 just before the crash and in a not so decent area and even that delivered a 2X in capital terms (more if you count the income). However the CGT tax did annoy me.

But then if you look at it on the basis of a £15k deposit outlay to a £150k gross return (capital appreciation) then that is 10x return in 17 years. Wipe out the CGT and you still get a return greater than 6x. These are capital appreciation only - add the the rental income and you get better figures.
jonathan rowe
Posted: 18 January 2024 17:04:12(UTC)
#12

Joined: 30/03/2018(UTC)
Posts: 176

Thanks: 48 times
Was thanked: 302 time(s) in 120 post(s)
I think CGT as a concept is fair enough, but removal of indexation relief and then tapering is a disgrace
2 users thanked jonathan rowe for this post.
Tim D on 18/01/2024(UTC), jeffian on 18/01/2024(UTC)
Rookie Investor
Posted: 18 January 2024 20:45:18(UTC)
#8

Joined: 09/12/2020(UTC)
Posts: 2,087

Tim D;293166 wrote:
Rookie Investor;293164 wrote:
17.6% is an amazing return, beating stocks I think. Add in leverage and your return on equity would be even greater.

Very unlikely to repeat.


This is why I am quite sanguine about selling it.

Some years ago I remember reading some Sunday paper's money pages article about which year to buy property in recent decades had produced the best annualised returns subsequently. IIRC, it was sometime in the mid 1990s, which is when we bought. Cannot be coincidence that that was the last time charts of "affordability" show any sort of dip, presumably after the 1980s excesses and "negative equity" bust had reset things a bit.


I think most people would be sanguine about selling it after that much return and the adverse environment for landlords!

It wouldn't be surprising if we never saw these gains for a very long time and quite possibly even see a nominal price decline for a decade or so. Whilst things adjust to the new higher rate regime.

But who knows really, and I would always prefer to own my own home no matter what prices did.
1 user thanked Rookie Investor for this post.
Tim D on 19/01/2024(UTC)
Rookie Investor
Posted: 18 January 2024 20:54:07(UTC)
#4

Joined: 09/12/2020(UTC)
Posts: 2,087

Tim D;293165 wrote:
Rookie Investor;293163 wrote:
Even if a new kitchen or bathroom might be though of as an improvement, it likely is just replacing old for new and would not be usually regarded as a cost for cgt purposes, rather it would be revenue expense that you could have used to reduce taxable profit.

So a replacement kitchen with newer items wouldn't usually count as a loss against capital gains. But maybe an installation of a dishwasher that wasn't there previously might. Or an extension or attic conversion as you had probably would be considered as an expense to offset against capital gains.


Interestingly, the gov.uk's own website for submitting this return does contain a bit of guidance on this and a "luxury kitchen" is actually one of the specific examples they included as something that'd be an improvement. (I'd go get the exact text and quote it but I don't want to open a can of worms by reopening the web form and making it think I'm resubmitting it or something.)

I don't know about "luxury" but we certainly ripped out some shonky mouldering chipboard-and-formica cabinets and worktops and replaced them with oak and granite. Of course some of the total cost of that could be seen as just getting the original kitchen back up to spec ("maintainance") and then only the added value beyond that would be "improvement". A minefield to work out some sensible numbers even if we had any paperwork.

The thing is that we did all this stuff while we were living there before we rented it out, so the question of whether it was an expense against rental income or not never arose. Certainly once we were renting the place out we claimed all expenses against income (and they were all maintenance things... we didn't do anything that could be remotely considered an improvement after we left.)


Similar situation to me. Replaced the old dated kitchen for new. But I am not sure this would be classed as luxury. Some people would think not as its merely replacing old for new. Luxury would be seen as something like increasing the size of a kitchen substantially etc. But I am not sure.

I suppose there is no harm in assuming it as improvement and if challenged you can make your case (worse case you just pay the higher tax liability?). But you would need invoices etc. Depending what I sell mine for I certainly would like more losses to offset the gains on my portfolio. So I might put forward the kitchen costs as improvement and see what they say. I'll have to be careful about not diffusing the gains in my portfolio too much in case hmrc's potential challenge is successful, and so inadvertently having to pay out some cgt tax.
1 user thanked Rookie Investor for this post.
Tim D on 19/01/2024(UTC)
jonathan rowe
Posted: 19 January 2024 09:14:31(UTC)
#5

Joined: 30/03/2018(UTC)
Posts: 176

Thanks: 48 times
Was thanked: 302 time(s) in 120 post(s)
Rookie Investor;293186 wrote:
Tim D;293165 wrote:
Rookie Investor;293163 wrote:
Even if a new kitchen or bathroom might be though of as an improvement, it likely is just replacing old for new and would not be usually regarded as a cost for cgt purposes, rather it would be revenue expense that you could have used to reduce taxable profit.

So a replacement kitchen with newer items wouldn't usually count as a loss against capital gains. But maybe an installation of a dishwasher that wasn't there previously might. Or an extension or attic conversion as you had probably would be considered as an expense to offset against capital gains.


Interestingly, the gov.uk's own website for submitting this return does contain a bit of guidance on this and a "luxury kitchen" is actually one of the specific examples they included as something that'd be an improvement. (I'd go get the exact text and quote it but I don't want to open a can of worms by reopening the web form and making it think I'm resubmitting it or something.)

I don't know about "luxury" but we certainly ripped out some shonky mouldering chipboard-and-formica cabinets and worktops and replaced them with oak and granite. Of course some of the total cost of that could be seen as just getting the original kitchen back up to spec ("maintainance") and then only the added value beyond that would be "improvement". A minefield to work out some sensible numbers even if we had any paperwork.

The thing is that we did all this stuff while we were living there before we rented it out, so the question of whether it was an expense against rental income or not never arose. Certainly once we were renting the place out we claimed all expenses against income (and they were all maintenance things... we didn't do anything that could be remotely considered an improvement after we left.)


Similar situation to me. Replaced the old dated kitchen for new. But I am not sure this would be classed as luxury. Some people would think not as its merely replacing old for new. Luxury would be seen as something like increasing the size of a kitchen substantially etc. But I am not sure.

I suppose there is no harm in assuming it as improvement and if challenged you can make your case (worse case you just pay the higher tax liability?). But you would need invoices etc. Depending what I sell mine for I certainly would like more losses to offset the gains on my portfolio. So I might put forward the kitchen costs as improvement and see what they say. I'll have to be careful about not diffusing the gains in my portfolio too much in case hmrc's potential challenge is successful, and so inadvertently having to pay out some cgt tax.


You could also argue that:

* tenant (and general) expectations have raised in terms of kitchen quality, most kitchens now have quartz/composite worktops instead of the old chipboard ones, undermounted sinks instead of the top mounted ones with integrated drainer, mixer taps instead of seperate taps

* it has a beneficial effect on revenue

* a better quality kitchen lasts longer

Have strong arguments prepared for a challenge, HMRC expect smallfry to rollover, I had one challenge which I defended vociferously with a well put together & researched letter, they backed off
1 user thanked jonathan rowe for this post.
Tim D on 19/01/2024(UTC)
2 Pages12Next page
+ Reply to discussion

Markets

Other markets