Bob Macondale;304211 wrote:One point that might be worth bearing in mind from the Citywire commentary;
“Rutter, Kenney and Clarke joined RLAM in 2017 from Waverton, where they managed the firm’s Global Equity fund”
I have no knowledge on how they performed at Waverton, but if you are looking for some potential positives this shows they have a track record of moving as a team and establishing some new decent funds.
Any views of best alternatives or what decisions other posters come to I am sure would be appreciated.
I will sound like I am flip flopping, as I am a self declared fan of this fund. But it's again worth reminding ourselves that we look at performance, and then we find a narrative to explain why something has done well.
So RLGES has done well past few years, and I am drinking the Kool aid that's it's the managers highly differentiated approach, and their corporate lifecycle investing, and so on.
But weren't people saying the same thing about Fundsmith a few years ago? Who'd buy value stocks, just buy quality, high ROCE etc, he's a genius blah blah.
What if they were just right time, right place for their approach?
The fund has a record of outperforming in 20 years out of 23 which is astounding, however the blockbuster outperformance of recent years (underperformed in 2019 too, so it's 2020/21/22/23 where they've smashed it) is quite unusual.
At Waverton the performance was nowhere near as good.
They outperformed by 0.4 - 1.5% a year for 3 years, underperformed by 8% one year and outperformed by 4% one year (relative returns, in USD, vs MSCI World).
Since joining RLAM they underperformed in 2019, but have delivered 6/7% outperformance in all other years.
Maybe they got loads better at investing when joining RLAM, maybe they were held back from investing how they wanted to at Waverton and RLAM unleashed their potential, or maybe they just got lucky for a few years in the way we see funds do.
Edit to add;

in fairness Waverton looks the anomaly
There's no like for like replacement in the OEIC world, the only offering that has a similar return profile and approach really is JGGI. But again, no one cared about JGGI in 2018/19/20 - who knows if that will still be a good bet over the 10/20/30 year time horizon some people have....
One other consideration, we don't know whether the soft closing of the fund was driven by RLAM's compliance folks seeing an issue with liquidity or driven by the managers. Perhaps that decision to cap their AUM (and thus limit their earning potential) was taken above their head and is what has led to them deciding to exit....
Maybe they set up shop, gather loads of assets and their approach doesn't work. Or maybe they set up shop and deliver that 6%-7% outperformance year on year for the next 10 years. Really none of us know!