Newbie;314962 wrote:Rookie Investor;314741 wrote:Imagine if $20bn is not paid by google to apple anymore. $20bn is a quarter's worth of net income for apple. Without it a quarter of their profits vanish. The payment is also 100% profit margin. So their % margins will fall a bit.
Seems to me Apple and others sold to the highest bidder which ended up being google. Not the other way around.
Maybe that was a key reason for berkshire selling their stake in apple?
Never a dull day in markets and especially in technology investments!
But then (the other side of the trade) does that not mean theat GOOG has saved $20bn and thus helps boost its books.
I have started buying all parties concerned (GOOG, BRK, AAPL- and in that order !)
Taking a different tact - buy the distressing outburst news, sell on the good remedial news (too many commentators with little skin in the game)
Indeed, and as an owner of Google for over 5 years it would be much welcome.
Risk to Google though is that Android (which is 70% of the smart phone market) and Google must split ways because it is monopolistic (similar to MSFT and IE). But I think this might depend on how forceful Android is for its users to use the SE. And I suspect the outcome of this scenario won't matter too much as the android users will most likely continue to use google SE. I mean why bother using anything else?
MSFT (also own it for many years) went through all this decades ago and continues to but somehow pulls through the hurdles (even got away with purchasing Activision). So I am in the belief that Google will do just fine (just pay the fines - pun intended!).
Happy to see Berkshire (as an owner) make tough decisions like selling some Apple; presumably because of prospective returns concerns given valuation but perhaps the $20bn payment suddenly disappearing from Apple's bottom line may have something to do with it also.
It will be interesting to see what the courts decide RE the Google case.