Joined: 06/11/2016(UTC) Posts: 1,479
Thanks: 392 times Was thanked: 1850 time(s) in 844 post(s)
|
D Bergman;334417 wrote:I had increased contributions to our SIPPs on the assumption of IHT-free inheritance, so like others I have started to change my plans. We have 2 SIPPs, valued at £600K & £350K, and have not yet taken any TFLS from them.
I will take the full 25% before April 5th, transfer to our son and take out an 7-year insurance policy written in trust for him to cover the possible IHT (we are 75 & 74 years old). I will then take up to the maximum 20% income tax liability, with the limitation that this should not push any dividends from my GIA into higher dividend tax. What we’ll do with the money I’m not yet certain, but I think grandchildren’s ISAs will benefit.
Also am planning a very expensive trip to SE Asia, and Business Class with SIA LON - SIN @ about £7K pp return would swallow up some of the cash, & the spouse has mentioned that Raffles Hotel has very nice suites.
But seriously, I think it makes more sense to use up as much of the SIPPs as possible, use profits/income from ISAs to top up what we need and leave the GIA to the next generation.
And I’m increasing our charitable giving to ensure any higher-rate taxable income is used up. These are all excellent outcomes with benefits for individuals, families, the economy, and wider society. SIPPs are going back to the true purpose, which is a pension savings vehicle, not a means of avoiding a fair tax. Osborne was wrong to introduce the loophole and Reeves is correct to abolish it.
|
|
3 users thanked Robert D for this post.
|