Sara G;335938 wrote:Actual Black Swans must be even rarer and more obscure than they were before, because I get the sense that almost anything is now possible, and so many possibilities have spiralled into forecasts or been factored into people's strategies. Trump putting the $ back on the gold standard (having revalued US gold reserves) was the most recent one I've heard.
It may be that it isn't the big headline stuff that upends everything (in investing terms at least). It might be something blowing up in the private credit markets (for example) - but that isn't really a black swan as lots of people have thought of it, it just doesn't make the news so much. It was the same with sub-prime lending before the GFC. But something unconsidered in the financial system would be my bet.
I suppose the opposite question is also of interest, i.e. what is the potential upside if none of the above materialises? It may be limited where valuations are already high.
This is exactly right. I get the impression that these sorts of threads get started by people who find market highs as a bit perplexing given the constant bombardment of negative news across various media. It is a naive way of thinking. The classic type 1 thinking as per Daniel Kahneman.
Markets are pricing in the good, bad and ugly. It is incredibly hard to know at the index level what future returns will be like. Far easier at an individual company level.
I think it is fair to assume markets are broadly correct in its pricing, such that all news has been discounted.
You might as well chat about the things Andrew brings up with a random bloke down the pub. You will get a more enjoyment out of the discussion and hopefully realise these things should not be taken seriously, at least not enough to make significant changes to portfolio.