Mick H;337343 wrote:According to the link you shared, the first fund is 90% invested in UK stocks and the second one is global (65% US), so they are very different.
The only advice I can offer is make sure you understand what the fund is invested in, and that it meets your investment intentions (I usually look at countries and sectors, and select a fund based on whatever theme/trend I feel offers value). Also make sure you understand what the fund costs to buy and hold in your investment platform.
Hi Mick, thanks for pointing out that the wrong link was attached.
It should be this -
a HSBC all world index fund @ 0.13% ongoing charge
https://markets.ft.com/d...ance?s=GB00BMJJJF91:GBP
a HSBC global dynamic multi-fund @ 0.22% ongoing charge
https://markets.ft.com/d...arts?s=GB00B849DT80:GBP
I need to choose between one of them. The Index is on my selection list because it has a cheap ongoing charge. Not sure if this is true, trackers often perform better than multi funds?
The Hsbc Global strategy multi- fund because it has lots of indices and I don't have the knowledge to rebalance it although it is more expensive. Is there a better product out there?
This forum did not allow me to copy The Trustnet charting showing both products along with their respective index. The chart showed The Hsbc all world index fund coincided with the All world index. But the HSBC dynamic fund was way above the IA volatility managed index
Dumb question spoiler! -
Why then is the index fund's 10 year performance better than the multi-fund, even though the multi fund's graph line is higher that its index?
Finance is not my field. Apologies for such a basic question - but its really bothering me.
.