Law Man;63254 wrote:Don: I appreciate your desire to keep costs down, but consider the costs of getting it wrong and the cost of your time.
It is not my field, but I suspect the whole value of the house may be taxable, given the deceased continued to live in it. That may account for a higher estate figure.
Nope. Why would our 56% share of the house be taxable? The house was both our home (mine and my wife's) and also my mother's home too. Inheritance tax is payable on the estate of the deceased (if over the £323k threshold) and my mother only owned part of her home, not all of it. I know HMRC would tax daylight and oxygen if they could, but they can't make me pay inheritance tax on something that I paid for myself and didn't inherit!
She gifted her portion of the house (44%) to us in Q3 2013 and this is called a "
Gift with a Reservation of Benefit" as she continued to live in the house (thus deriving benefit) even though she had gifted us her equitable interest in the house in 2013.
This gift would be liable for IHT if (a) it was large enough and (b) made recently (within the last 7 years). Beyond 7 years, it is ignored for IHT purposes. The amount of IHT payable is on a sliding scale - called '
Tapered Relief' and as Q3 2013 is between 4 and 5 years ago, it reduces the IHT percentage (if payable) from 40% to 24% [between 5 and 6 years it is reduced to 16% and between 6 and 7 years to 8%. Above 7 years, it is zero].
Law Man;63254 wrote:Given that, use of (1) inheritance of the pre-deceased husband's nil rate band and (2) the property nil rate band (applicable if the beneficiaries are children or grandchildren) may get you home without tax.
Again, no - there is simply no need.
The whole of my mother's estate is far less than the £325,000 threshold for IHT purposes - actually around 2/3 - so as I said in my post (#4 this thread), there is simply no need to use these extra allowances. Personally, given the complexity of the IHT400 form and the associated schedules, I don't see the need to further complicate matters by adding to the number of forms I have to fill in when there is aboluely no need. As it stands my liability for IHT on my mother's estate is nil - it is only that the IHT400 form is so complicated and I haven't filled it in correctly that the figure keeps coming out wrong.
Interestingly my wife contacted Which? Legal this afternoon asking if they could help with the completioin of the IHT400 and their reply was essentially "we don't touch those - they're far too complicated!"
Further to the above, my wife used the on-line IHT400 calculator today using the figures we had put in our latest version of the IHT400 and it said zero tax to pay - so maybe we've kind of got it right now.
When you go to swear the oath at the probate office, they check the form anyway, so I guess they'll flag it up there if anything is amiss.
Regards
Don