Funds Insider - Opening the door to funds

Welcome to the Citywire Funds Insider Forums, where members share investment ideas and discuss everything to do with their money.

You'll need to log in or set up an account to start new discussions or reply to existing ones. See you inside!

Notification

Icon
Error

Why people tend to stick in the social and economic class in which they are born
Jeremy Bosk
Posted: 03 July 2014 14:53:51(UTC)
#51

Joined: 09/06/2010(UTC)
Posts: 1,316

Sandid3

All those of voting age are involved in politics whether consciously or not. Registering to vote or not; actually voting or not; thinking (or not thinking) about the issues are all political acts.

Most of those who do vote, vote for parties of the right and far right. Which is to say New Labour, Lib-Dem, Tory and UKIP.

People who go along with evil policies and social attitudes, because they are wilfully blind to the consequences, are themselves evil.

True morality requires observation of reality and questioning thought, not blind acceptance of social norms.

The unexamined life is not worth living (Socrates).
Clive B
Posted: 03 July 2014 15:45:17(UTC)
#52

Joined: 25/11/2010(UTC)
Posts: 508

Sandid3

"Scotland votes for independence"

Some would say "let's hope so, no more New Labour"
Jeremy Bosk
Posted: 03 July 2014 19:29:43(UTC)
#53

Joined: 09/06/2010(UTC)
Posts: 1,316

Clive B

If an American owned fascist traitor like Blair isn't evil and insane enough for you, why not go the whole way and vote BNP?

Or, if you just want to wreck the economy because you hate the EU, No2EU is an electoral coalition of the Socialist Party of Great Britain (Marxist-Leninist) and the Communist Party of Britain (Marxist-Leninist). Which parties are just as insane as the Tories but less evil.
Clive B
Posted: 03 July 2014 21:49:55(UTC)
#54

Joined: 25/11/2010(UTC)
Posts: 508

Jeremy

Rather than telling us which political ideas you're against (more or less every established party it seems), why don't you tell us what you're for
sandid3
Posted: 04 July 2014 07:43:33(UTC)
#55

Joined: 18/02/2013(UTC)
Posts: 651

"True morality requires observation of reality and questioning thought, not blind acceptance of social norms. The unexamined life is not worth living (Socrates)."

Is that morality or an ideology?

The thing about the Scottish referendum is that it has forced a large number of people to enter the discussion. Presumably that's because they can see this binary decision will have major consequences one way or the other. A very high voter turnout is expected.

In national elections a large number of people don't vote because they (correctly) see the London-dominated, big-party system as totally corrupt. It seems to me a Yes vote in Scotland will give English and Welsh voters a real opportunity to shake off London's chains. Anyway, it's probably the only decent opportunity they're going to get.

Jeremy Bosk
Posted: 05 July 2014 10:42:53(UTC)
#56

Joined: 09/06/2010(UTC)
Posts: 1,316

sandid3

Mindless conformity is not morality, it is mindless conformity.

Experience tells me that people who think about how they live their life and why they do what they do (outside the compulsions of school, work and the law) make better decisions and live more meaningful lives. This idea of individual responsibility was at the heart of the Protestant Reformation. To oversimplify somewhat: read the Bible and think for yourself, don't just take orders from the priest.

NB this is not a plea for more religion: I am an atheist.

I agree that the Scottish referendum is producing some soul searching in the midst of the rabble rousing. I suspect that many, even most, people who vote will do so along the lines they decided long ago without much considering new evidence. Sorting the wheat from the chaff in a propaganda war is just too difficult. I have spent some time reading the readers' comments in The Scotsman and The Herald. Which may give me a jaundiced view of the deliberative process.
sandid3
Posted: 06 July 2014 03:38:01(UTC)
#57

Joined: 18/02/2013(UTC)
Posts: 651

My starting point is that there’s something very different about London ‘values’ compared to Northern values. It wasn’t always so but I think that divide is becoming more extreme.

Take the dictionary definition of morality as ‘principles concerning the distinction between right and wrong or good and bad behaviour’.

Given the extraordinary catalog of fraud and corruption revealed about almost every aspect of London life, from Westminster to the public sector to the private sector, I’d say there’s a widespread belief in London that being deceitful and ‘keeping your mouth shut’ are not wrong at all but clever – they’re what you do. London is essentially the white-collar crime capital of the world – and it’s not just a few bad apples at the top.

I don’t think this is mindless conformity; Londoners voted for Boris, mindful of not risking the gravy train. Do they really believe the rightwing dogma of efficient markets when what they’re actually doing is cheating people on an industrial scale? Who knows; but they recognize it as a good excuse.

London is essentially a ‘bad’ place. That’s why I don’t think there’s any chance of the status quo being changed through voting Labour, say. It will take a social revolution.

The British version of good or bad has developed from the Christian tradition. But it’s only what we believe; it’s not an absolute truth. There was a good article in Business Insider that shows how we fit on the world scale: This Chart Explains Every Culture in the World.

The other major aspect of British culture is the welfare state – the very thing the rightwing crooks are trying to destroy. The welfare state was established after WWII when Brits voted against having Churchill as PM. They did so partly to prevent a return to the pre-war situation of a privileged elite – the very thing today’s rightwing crooks want and the reason they claim Churchill as their own.

Scotland is showing that the welfare state can be made to work efficiently – another reason it’s such a threat to rightwing ideology. I’m sure there’ll be a lot more dirty tricks from Lynton Crosby before the vote.
2 users thanked sandid3 for this post.
Martina on 06/07/2014(UTC), Jeremy Bosk on 03/09/2014(UTC)
Jeremy Bosk
Posted: 06 July 2014 19:08:37(UTC)
#58

Joined: 09/06/2010(UTC)
Posts: 1,316

Sandid3

I agree with you that merely voting Labour will not make for fundamental change. We need to engage with our councillors, MPs, MEPs and so on. Getting involved as an activist within a political party is hard work and often frustrating. I speak from experience.

The hardest part is accepting the need for compromise and the horse trading. Blair's New Labour compromised itself out of all concern for right and wrong. It became a faction of the Tory Party.

Your generalisation about Londoners is far too sweeping. I know several personally who are very decent people. If you said that many highly paid wheelers and dealers in finance are crooks, I would agree. I also agree that pay differentials and the bonus culture are ridiculous.

I have also known quite a few northerners who were thieves, con merchants, wide boys (and girls) in general - usually on a smaller scale than The City spivs - and take care not to know such people well. I am a Northerner who lived down south for five years and worked in London for some of that time. I prefer it up here.

I entirely agree about the Welfare State.
2 users thanked Jeremy Bosk for this post.
Martina on 06/07/2014(UTC), sandid3 on 07/07/2014(UTC)
Alan Selwood
Posted: 06 July 2014 20:36:52(UTC)
#59

Joined: 17/12/2011(UTC)
Posts: 3,379

Thanks: 735 times
Was thanked: 7200 time(s) in 2183 post(s)
Differences of opinion about how to run a country were ever thus!

I was talking a couple of weeks ago to a very bright young Roumanian woman who runs a b & b in the Wensleydale area (while I was on holiday 'up North'). One of her comments was that the politicians in Roumania are crooks, just like the ones in London. I asked her if she would like the politicians to swap countries, and she said 'no' - they were both corrupt, though her own countrymen were more brazen about their stealing!

Like most people in most countries, the 'ordinary man and woman in the street' are for the most part upright citizens who do their best, but rotten apples form an unfortunate minority in all parts of the globe.

We can only do our best to set a good example ourselves.
2 users thanked Alan Selwood for this post.
sandid3 on 07/07/2014(UTC), Jeremy Bosk on 03/09/2014(UTC)
sandid3
Posted: 07 July 2014 08:06:38(UTC)
#60

Joined: 18/02/2013(UTC)
Posts: 651

Sorry to go on but this is the core problem as I see it. There is a fundamental difference between conventional crime (stealing and lies by thieves, con merchants and brazen politicians) and white-collar crime. White-collar crime basically involves deceit and withholding information (keeping shtum).

The big financial scandals are all white-collar crimes (selling mortgages that wouldn’t be repaid, selling unemployment insurance that wouldn’t pay out, selling protection that actually caused losses). There are a few small fry that actually did the mis-selling (for big bonuses) but there was a huge layer of lawyers, middle managers, executives, advisers, etc. that benefitted. We can now say the same about the media after Coulson.

These scams weren’t planned by a mastermind. The scary thing is that they evolved. Some random mutation in the course of business revealed a scam that worked. After that, the scam reproduced and thrived in a supportive environment.

For conventional crime we have laws against theft and fraud. But white-collar crime requires proof of intent rather than just the outcome. Under our laws, unless someone admits wrongdoing it’s almost impossible to prove bad intent.

The only protection is regulation. But every aspect of power in London will put ever obstacle in its way – cut the red tape. That’s why they can’t be defeated from the inside.

But what about the little people? Where are the whistleblowers? I’m sure many decent people go to London with hopes high. But, in a sense, they become victims too – prisoners of massive loans and expenses. So they keep shtum and vote for Boris.

After his Flash Boys book came out, The Guardian had an open Q&A with Michael Lewis. I asked him what the answer was to white-collar crime. He said “I think the most important thing, at least inside the financial system, is to change the incentives for the people involved. You're never going to have a crime free Wall Street. But it would be nice if there wasn't so much damaging activity that was perfectly legal.” Quite.
1 user thanked sandid3 for this post.
Jeremy Bosk on 03/09/2014(UTC)
10 Pages«Previous page45678Next page»
+ Reply to discussion

Markets

Other markets