Alexander Johnston;100207 wrote:I'm instinctively cautious on this sort of thing as well. I have no experience of it but there are some perhaps obvious things to ponder.
Presumably your father-in-law will have to sell one bungalow and buy another and incur the transactional costs. Inevitably the new bungalow will require some perhaps unforeseen expenditures.
Presumably he will only be taking out a mortgage to cover the additional price of the new property. Obviously the smaller this is the better.
Will his existing bungalow sell relatively quickly and is he reasonably confident he will get his asking price?
Is the 4% fixed?
4% seems high to me.
Is the disruption really worth it given their age?
Their current property is a two story house on a very steep hill. The reason for the potential move to the bungalow is my Mother-In-Law's deteriorating mobility. If it wasn't for that, they probably wouldn't want to move.
The transactional costs would be rolled up into the mortgage, but even then, they would only be borrowing around £30k max against a £260k property.
The current house is in a desirable location and would likely sell very quickly. The price he expects he will get for it is on the low side based on current prices in the area, so he should get at least that amount.
The bungalow is in very good shape and wouldn't need much,if anything, doing to it. Their current house, on the other hand, needs some work. Mainly cosmetic, but the wiring could also do with updating. This is probably one of the main reasons for the difference in price between the two properties.
The 4% is fixed for for the entirety of the mortgage. I've seen rates at around 3%, but I don't know if these cheaper rates are fixed, and whether these mortgages have the same protections. But yes he would need to shop around.