Funds Insider - Opening the door to funds

Welcome to the Citywire Funds Insider Forums, where members share investment ideas and discuss everything to do with their money.

You'll need to log in or set up an account to start new discussions or reply to existing ones. See you inside!

Notification

Icon
Error

Price Elasticity
Matthew Charles Flinders
Posted: 05 April 2012 16:56:16(UTC)
#1

Joined: 04/01/2012(UTC)
Posts: 68

Hello

Currently studying an A Level in Economics and I have now come across the wonderful concept of Elasticity and all its different variations.

Could someone please explain to me why a Rolex Watch is classed as Price Elastic?

My initial thought is that a Rolex Watch is Price Inelastic, this is a niche product aimed at the rich. If the price goes up, for example by 10%. Will this put off a buyer? People buying a Rolex Watch would probably not care about a price change, hence my initial thought of it being price Inelastic.

But apparently I am wrong...
sgjhaghsdg
Posted: 05 April 2012 19:14:50(UTC)
#2

Joined: 07/01/2011(UTC)
Posts: 227

But said "rich" person doesn't have to buy that brand of watch as there are lots of other premium watch brands, and they can also both delay the purchase and/or chose a cheaper model of the same brand.

Homework: Research Giffen goods versus Veblen goods, and also read "The millionaire next door" to realise that rich people may not always be what they seem.
Matthew Charles Flinders
Posted: 05 April 2012 20:03:14(UTC)
#3

Joined: 04/01/2012(UTC)
Posts: 68

So basically, a Rolex watch is price elastic, because of the fact there are other brands of premium watches?
sgjhaghsdg
Posted: 05 April 2012 21:29:10(UTC)
#4

Joined: 07/01/2011(UTC)
Posts: 227

> So basically, a Rolex watch is price elastic, because of the fact there are other brands of premium watches?

I'd argue that that's a big part of the argument, yet others would disagree.

If you want straight answers then go for hard science subjects rather than soft ones. Economics seems to have little predictive power so I mostly ignore it.
mark senior
Posted: 20 April 2012 11:25:18(UTC)
#5

Joined: 20/09/2010(UTC)
Posts: 244

@ Matthew

I'm with you on this.

My interpretation of demand for Rolex watches would be that they are relatively price inelastic.

I would like to read the view that you are receiving saying that Rolex would be price elastic.

goods of ostentation are usually relatively inelastic.

I have to declare that I hold a degree in Economics.

I hope this helps...... stick to your guns unless the other person can give you a well thought out argument.

Kind regards

Mark

mark senior
Posted: 20 April 2012 11:31:32(UTC)
#6

Joined: 20/09/2010(UTC)
Posts: 244

@ Matthew

I have thought further and I would definitely categorise Rolex product as a "VEBLEN" good

A product of conspicuous consumption or status.

In this situation Inelasticity of demand would be the correct interpretation.

Kind regards

Mark
Hotrod
Posted: 20 April 2012 11:34:27(UTC)
#7

Joined: 10/06/2010(UTC)
Posts: 21

A man went into a car showroom and asked the salesman: "How much is that Rolls Royce"?
The salesman replied: "If you have to ask the price, you can't afford it"
What this means is that owing to RR's being produced in limited numbers only the super rich will get the opportunity to purchase a new one regardless of what it cost to make. The price paid is of secondary importance.
I learn't a long time ago that price has nothing to do with production costs. It's all about how much someone is prepared to pay.
Now, take the case of a Rolex watch. Say for instance the firm recommends a retail price of £10,000 based upon the number they can supply the market with set against expected sales. For example the cost of production plus profit is £5,000 then the retail mark up would be 100% making an initial selling price of £10,000
This would allow plenty of leeway should sales fall short of the expected volume. The salesman can then offer a substantial discount and the prospective buyer will think that he is getting a bargain, even though the retailer's overall sales and profitability are relatively constant.
Interestingly a pre-war Rolex oyster watch was presented to a dealer yesterday on Dickinson's Real Deal. It was not working, the strap was worn out, the dial and case tarnished and scratched. Had it not had Rolex written on it, anyone would of said: "It's rubbish, put it in the bin"
However, the dealer offered £50 for it, which the seller refused. It was sold at auction for over £200 Which goes to show that rarity and established quality names are the two most important factors in determining price.
abbass hassan
Posted: 20 April 2012 13:33:56(UTC)
#8

Joined: 13/06/2009(UTC)
Posts: 14

I am an Omega collector , the demand for this kind of watch higher than Rolex.
Steve P
Posted: 23 April 2012 12:58:01(UTC)
#9

Joined: 02/05/2007(UTC)
Posts: 47

A bit late perhaps, but I agree with the first response from sgjhaghsdg.

A Rolex can be price elastic if people are prepared to buy a similar product, such as an Omega, instead. This is due to the brand loyalty (or lack of it).

Kellogg's corn Flakes, if I remember correctly, are very price inelastic despite being cheap, because even if Kellogg's raised the price significantly, buyers would still generally want Kellogg's Corn Flakes instead of supermarket own-brand corn flakes or other substitute products.

Graham Barlow
Posted: 23 April 2012 15:40:05(UTC)
#10

Joined: 09/03/2009(UTC)
Posts: 203

The product that all Politicians crave is one that is inelastic in demand. The one Tax generator they have really come unstuck on is Petrol/Diesel Fuel. With Tax at nearly 70% of cost the Revenue generator has really crashed. The amount of mileage being driven is going down like a stone. People are cutting back drastically and saving billions of litres with careful management and cutting out unessential journeys. The one thing they were sure of was that it was inelastic in demand. . There will always be some consumer to buy a Rolex, and all the other ridiculous brands which will still run a mile below the Atlantic Ocean. The same goes for the Roller, although it doesn't even look like a Rolls Royce ,more like a Tuetonic Tiger Tank in White. The Chinese love it thinking it is the real thing. BMW are charging up to £250000 for it,so it must be inelastic in demand. Cache and one upmanship transcends price. Conspicous ownership snobbery is a guarantee against price resistance. If you can attain this in your product you are on to a winner. Why do you think the Germans bought the name Rolls Royce Cars?
2 Pages12Next page
+ Reply to discussion

Markets

Other markets