Funds Insider - Opening the door to funds

Welcome to the Citywire Funds Insider Forums, where members share investment ideas and discuss everything to do with their money.

You'll need to log in or set up an account to start new discussions or reply to existing ones. See you inside!

Notification

Icon
Error

Maximise money to kids - ISA, lifetime ISA, Pension
Easyrider
Posted: 12 March 2022 20:58:23(UTC)
#8

Joined: 09/11/2020(UTC)
Posts: 1,951

Thanks: 3499 times
Was thanked: 2612 time(s) in 1147 post(s)
countrymum;213658 wrote:
Mr GL;213621 wrote:

Pension – add £2,880 – and get tax relief bringing it up to £3,600 (I don’t know / understand how the tax relief works -assuming I am not working / have no income and wife's employer is contributing 24k a year to her own pension – not sure who of us it is better for the contribution to come from – wife is not a higher rate tax payer (she earns less than £50k PA) – I earn pretty much nothing) – and then I would like to do the same in the next tax year. The pension contributor is only relevant if there is a more efficient way to get additional tax relief if it comes from wife or I - I dont think it can 'come from' my mum's estate?

My understanding is that kids only qualify for basic tax relief - unless they are a high income earner in their own right. And it doesn't matter who puts in to it.



The way the pension works is that the tax relief of 25% is added to your contributions by the provider of the pension and invested for the child in his or her pot.
For example if you put in the maximum yearly lump sum of £2,880 this will be automatically increased to £3600 by the provider.
Similarly is you put in £240 a month this will be automatically increased to £300.
Parents and grandparents can contribute subject to these ceilings.
The tax relief is at the standard rate. The way it works is not a tax relief to you but a tax enhancement channelled to the child's pot.

My understanding is that you are allowed to give £3k a year to children and grandchildren without it potentially figuring in inheritance tax. That is £3 in total or £6k a year for both parents. If, for example, you intend to assist 3 beneficiaries, then it's £1k each or £2k each if both parents are contributing.
Any monies in excess of this are not potentially subject to inheritance tax if you live for at least 7 years. I'm no expert so I suggest it may be useful to double check what I have said in this paragraph.
1 user thanked Easyrider for this post.
Mr GL on 13/03/2022(UTC)
Newbie
Posted: 13 March 2022 23:53:18(UTC)
#12

Joined: 31/01/2012(UTC)
Posts: 3,821

Thanks: 6020 times
Was thanked: 7033 time(s) in 2605 post(s)
Easyrider;213692 wrote:
Bulldog Drummond;213686 wrote:
It is possible that HMRC might not notice a bag of Krugerrands.



One of my friends had a recent communication from HMRC. They queried the amount of his State Pension on the grounds that he had understated it in his tax form.
He had filled in his tax form and stated the amount of his State Pension by adding up the amount he had received over the financial year.
HMRC stated that he had understated the amount of his State Pension and he should have his tax code changed forthwith.
He refused on the ground that his Tax Code should be based on what he ACTUALLY received rather than what he SHOULD have received.
He eventually won his case.
The amount of money involved: £2.

Reminds me of an acquaintance who, some year ago received a cheque for £0.01 as he had overpaid his local authority. The account department must be pulling their hair out for 20+ years later he still has not banked it, for It is framed and in his living room.

At this level of silliness I suspect that given by the sizeable increases of his local authority bills, the accounts department must have done some hiring and grew in size as they still cannot balance the books and is £0.01 out and no one knows why.

The stationary and postage costs alone to send that cheque out must have cost a bit.
1 user thanked Newbie for this post.
Easyrider on 14/03/2022(UTC)
Easyrider
Posted: 14 March 2022 09:14:33(UTC)
#13

Joined: 09/11/2020(UTC)
Posts: 1,951

Thanks: 3499 times
Was thanked: 2612 time(s) in 1147 post(s)
Newbie;213806 wrote:
Easyrider;213692 wrote:
Bulldog Drummond;213686 wrote:
It is possible that HMRC might not notice a bag of Krugerrands.



One of my friends had a recent communication from HMRC. They queried the amount of his State Pension on the grounds that he had understated it in his tax form.
He had filled in his tax form and stated the amount of his State Pension by adding up the amount he had received over the financial year.
HMRC stated that he had understated the amount of his State Pension and he should have his tax code changed forthwith.
He refused on the ground that his Tax Code should be based on what he ACTUALLY received rather than what he SHOULD have received.
He eventually won his case.
The amount of money involved: £2.

Reminds me of an acquaintance who, some year ago received a cheque for £0.01 as he had overpaid his local authority. The account department must be pulling their hair out for 20+ years later he still has not banked it, for It is framed and in his living room.

At this level of silliness I suspect that given by the sizeable increases of his local authority bills, the accounts department must have done some hiring and grew in size as they still cannot balance the books and is £0.01 out and no one knows why.

The stationary and postage costs alone to send that cheque out must have cost a bit.



Completely daft.
They may required by law to reinburse overpayment no matter how small.
That's a favourable interpretation!
2 PagesPrevious page12
+ Reply to discussion

Markets

Other markets