Sara G;330615 wrote:I've not noticed any rightward shift in the people I have contact with. There still seem to be plenty of people buying what Starmer is selling and unwilling to even contemplate voting for a right of centre party of any description. Labour doesn't need to persuade a lot of people to support them in order to win a majority, as we have seen. But a lot can happen in 4 years, and perhaps the Overton window is mean reverting.
The way the Labour vote is structured means they will almost certainly be either the first or second party under FPTP.
In my psephological days, I mused about this, and suggested the Tories were far more vulnerable if they ever fell seriously out of favour. At one point, it looked as if the LibDems under Charlie Kennedy might conceivably eclipse the Tories under William Hague.
But it wasn't to be. The Tories found their own 'Blair' in Cameron, and the LibDems knifed poor Charlie...
The stars are aligning again however, this time for Reform, whose vote is similarly structured to the old LibDem vote (the new LibDem vote is much more concentrated than in the past).
Over a fairly narrow range (say 10%) Reform go from winning next to nothing to becoming the government.
They're already about half way up that hill, with four years to go...
And I can't see much of a "swingback" (a term I coined around 2008) to Labour, unless they pull some amazing rabbits out of the hat.
They got in by default with the lowest ever vote share. There was no love for them on polling day. There is a lot less love now...
As I said here before the election, Reform needed to smash the Tories first, then smashing Labour next time could be comparatively easy.
So far, so good...