Both candidates and both VP's wer/are truly awful.

The sad thing is that this is the best America can come up with.

I didn't support Harris, I just thought she was the least bad.


Today, it seems, the GOP are proposing a ban on the 'Morning After Pill'

https://www.newsweek.com...ng%20from%20conception.

Really? Anyone prepared to support that here?

Maybe. The birth rate here is far too low and the British will go extinct if it carries on. You seem to be in favour of this trend, for reasons that are unclear. I am not.

Your obsession with preventing pregnancy and birth is, frankly, quite disturbing. I personally like to see my family members, friends, neighbours, colleagues and wider community of people - who are like me - having children. Both my heart and my mind are satisfied by this, which is quite normal. What isn't normal is 2.5 million unborn-baby killings every decade and driving our birth rate through the floor. So that greedy people, who believe in nothing other than money, can lower the wage bill. All the other stupid, mad reasons are in the service of that hollow goal, plus laziness. Feminism, environmentalism, and all the other intellectual shite.

As I explained above, the much maligned (by people like you) Christian instincts are often morally sound and for the individual and greater good. The US are lucky to still have this spiritual vitality, in places. It could serve them very well indeed. Where we will end up on the other hand, if these self destructive trends carry on, is predictable enough.

Incidentally, I previously held views like yours and had a similar outlook. It seems to be part of an unfortunate cultural phenomenon. I realised the error of my ways.

So abortion in America 'nobody's business but theirs'.

But it's ok for Vance to lecture the UK on abortion protests. How is that not 'nobody's business but ours?'

Big fat dose of double standards right there...🤷🏼‍♂️

And yet you don't see that...😏

John Britain

https://youtu.be/2SOvr9fLHUM?feature=shared

Yes, it is a difficult thing. Unfortunately once the judiciary becomes politicised things get very very difficult. The US has a politicised supreme court anyway. It was I guess intended to offer some check and balance, but successive administrations have used it to make almost pure political appointments to the supreme court of ever less independently minded judges.

We have become infected by the same illness over here. The role of judges is supposed to be to impartially apply the law. However we have seen a new generation of judges and hosts of lefty lawyers that have seen their role as to advance the politics of the left/globalists, principally by distorting, corrupting, and endlessly extending the idea of individual human rights.

The battle between democrats and republicans and generally in the west between right leaning and left leaning has become ever more intense and ever dirtier, nastier, more corrupt, more partisan, more censorious, more litigious.

When I watched some of 'House of Cards' I thought it was far fetched. Now I see some voices claiming 57 politically inconvenient people strangely died or disappeared under the Clinton administration. You can't help but wonder how bad it is out there. 'They' killed JFK, 'they' tried to kill Trump. 'They' denied RFK Jr security protection.

I am always wary of self declared saviours. The only thing you can say is the globalist left was in danger of taking total control via the use of censorship, corruption and the immigrant vote.

I currently see Musk as autistic idealist rather than dictator. An antidote to the horrors of Soros and Gates. But as they say 'Power corrupts, absolute power corrupts absolutely'.