Funds Insider - Opening the door to funds

Welcome to the Citywire Funds Insider Forums, where members share investment ideas and discuss everything to do with their money.

You'll need to log in or set up an account to start new discussions or reply to existing ones. See you inside!

Notification

Icon
Error

In The News 2...
Laurence O'Brien
Posted: 08 February 2025 18:38:12(UTC)
#73

Joined: 04/12/2014(UTC)
Posts: 943

Thanks: 191 times
Was thanked: 1981 time(s) in 650 post(s)
There is only one religious group that people fear in the UK and it isn’t Christians, Jews, Hindus, Sikhs or Buddhists. Fear in the sense of a phobia, a word derived from the Greek φοβάμαι - to fear. It’s not hatred in the sense that some would have us believe but a genuine fear of a group of people who plant bombs or murder people in the streets or lay siege to the home of a teacher falsely accused of damaging a book. Why would any sane person not be afraid of people who carry out these atrocities?

Moderate Muslims really need to stand up and denounce those who are committing these acts whilst shouting Allahu Akbar but we don’t hear them and as I asked above, is it because they are afraid of them or do they tacitly support them?

The other big issue for me is the refusal of large sections of the Muslim population to integrate with the indigenous people of the country. They are the only religious group amongst those mentioned above who do not. Go to Bradford (the city of my birth and childhood) and you will see exactly what I mean. A city where I was threatened by a group of Pakistani youths for accidentally venturing into part of the city which they claimed to be theirs.
8 users thanked Laurence O'Brien for this post.
Jay P on 08/02/2025(UTC), guantou on 08/02/2025(UTC), Robin B on 08/02/2025(UTC), john brace on 08/02/2025(UTC), stephen_s on 08/02/2025(UTC), Guest on 09/02/2025(UTC), Lemanie on 09/02/2025(UTC), Neminem Laedit on 11/02/2025(UTC)
The KidKad
Posted: 11 February 2025 19:25:34(UTC)
#59

Joined: 07/08/2019(UTC)
Posts: 37

Thanks: 40 times
Was thanked: 54 time(s) in 26 post(s)
Robin B;333618 wrote:
The KidKad;333562 wrote:

Laurence, I will be direct here - this framing here is part of the problem - did we hold all Irish people accountable for things done by the IRA? And most would agree it is anti-Semitic to hold all Jews accountable for the acts of a state which does barbaric things in their name. But it is apparently fine to assume the worst about all Muslims unless they publicly declare their position from the rooftops at every juncture. I am no more a representative of the entire diverse Muslim community in the UK than you are of the Irish (going by your name - forgive me if Ive got that wrong) community. This is a double standard by any measure.

And to Robin directly - I may have been triggered by your recent comment but I'm actually making a wider point as you are certainly not the first on here to have posted on this matter of Muslims supposed inferiority or inability to integrate etc etc. There is a tone of it that permeates not just this forum but others elsewhere such as Reddit threads and that has prompted me to say enough-is-enough to this open season on bashing Muslims. These threads of well-heeled , "educated" , professional people prove Baroness Warsi correct when she says this type of prejudice has passed the "dinner party test". And frankly, your understanding is quite superficial if you are quoting India Today as a reliable source on what is happening - you may or may not be aware that Modi and the BJP/RSS org that he represents are deeply hostile to Muslims and are doing everything he can to demonise their own citizens and render them second class or less and are very happy to sow seeds of division abroad to this end also to justify their oppression at home. Fwiw, I am more than happy to discuss what is a complex issue resulting from decades of migration policy, foreign policy interventions, deindustrialisation of swathes of the country, integration policy and yes some social attitudes. However this has to be based on fact and reason starting from a place of good faith and objectivity which is lacking here. The logical conclusion of your train of thought is where the Austrian far right/ AfD are around re-migration of people and that's the disturbing/ disheartening bit. Some of us can see where this is headed as people are manipulated into this "othering" of a community. We seem to learn nothing from history.

Back to to those infra trusts on stubbornly high discounts....


Thank you for your response.

I'm getting two, somewhat contradictory, attitudes here.

1) as a muslim, why should you be answerable for the crimes or behaviour of others? That's fair enough, although I think what was suggested by Laurence was more to do with acknowledgement rather than ownership.

2) you are going to defend Muslims in general against what you see as unfair treatment and prejudice. So you seemingly are willing to be answerable for Muslims despite what was implied?

There appears to be an unwillingness to acknowledge the concerns of the majority in this country, who are the native people. You don't sound like a typical British person to be honest, or like somebody who has fully integrated. You identify as something different, and that identity and how it relates to other groups, seems to engender very strong feelings for you. This is normal human behaviour. But the question of compatibility is very real and present here. You obviously feel resentment about the way you believe others, and British society at large, views and treats Muslims.

You appear to see things from your own perspective but not the perspectives of others. Your posts strongly imply the existence of a separate society with its own identity, agendas and inteterests. I'm afraid Baronness Warsi isn't somebody most of us take seriously and we are dismayed that such a dreadful and divisive figure was ever promoted as she was. But to you, she is somebody who makes perfect sense.

This exchange only confirms some of the fears I have, particularly as you are probably a fairly moderate individual compared to a lot of others who have been allowed to immigrate. I have known a number of Muslims in other countries who were so well integrated that you wouldn't know they had any Muslim heritage unless they told you so. And there are some Muslim countries where the people seem much more moderate than many of those who we have living here. I am not referring to you, or all Muslims.

This country seems to have attracted varieties that are really quite hard line and who many in the world would find it difficult to get along with. Do you accept this or not? You mention India having a problem with Muslims. China does as well. And other east Asian countries. And Europe. And Israel. And parts of Africa. And the US. Is this all entirely down to the unreasonable behaviour of these different nations and peoples, making up the majority of the world's population? Or could there be more to it?

I'm not intending to make any sweeping statements here, and I have muslim-heritage friends who would support what I am saying. In fact, much of what I now think on this subject came from them. What I hope you will see is that I am trying to help you understand how it is that you are coming across to others. There are a lot of people here in Britain whose ancestry goes back thousands of years, who don't owe you anything, but might accept you, and others, if they fit in, have the same values and beliefs, and do not seek to promote incompatible or undesirable customs. This is all very normal and to be expected, is it not?

I will thank you again for helping to facilitate this conversation, which will hopefully lead to a better understanding between people.



" There are a lot of people here in Britain whose ancestry goes back thousands of years, who don't owe you anything, but might accept you, and others, if they fit in, have the same values and beliefs, and do not seek to promote incompatible or undesirable customs"

Listen to yourself. This is reminiscent of the blood libel against Jews hundreds of years ago. Your position can be summarised as "I/ we will accept you if you are Muslim in name only". And just an aside the thousands of years is point is just silly given what we know about the diverse origins of the vast majority of people on this island.

"Your posts strongly imply the existence of a separate society with its own identity, agendas and inteterests [sic]"

I think I said the exact opposite. Most people have the same desires and partake in everyday life in the same way as other Britons. Yes there is a distinct cultural/ religious identity but thats hardly unique to Muslims is it. And yes there are bad apples as in all communities, and yes some people seek to keep themselves apart either from fear (immigrant communities have historically clustered to provide safety in numbers) and /or access to community services such as places of worship. But again not unique if you've seen orthodox jewish populations in North London as an example.

"This country seems to have attracted varieties that are really quite hard line and who many in the world would find it difficult to get along with. Do you accept this or not?"

Please provide evidence before you make such sweeping statements.

Just be honest, with yourself and everyone else that you are not really interested in learning, mutual understanding or even just good old fashioned "rubbing along". You've made your mind up about a group of people I can tell you don't really know despite the "I have a muslim friend" of the classic racism defence genre.



2 users thanked The KidKad for this post.
Newbie on 11/02/2025(UTC), Steve Entwistle on 11/02/2025(UTC)
The KidKad
Posted: 11 February 2025 19:33:41(UTC)
#74

Joined: 07/08/2019(UTC)
Posts: 37

Thanks: 40 times
Was thanked: 54 time(s) in 26 post(s)
Laurence O'Brien;333673 wrote:
There is only one religious group that people fear in the UK and it isn’t Christians, Jews, Hindus, Sikhs or Buddhists. Fear in the sense of a phobia, a word derived from the Greek φοβάμαι - to fear. It’s not hatred in the sense that some would have us believe but a genuine fear of a group of people who plant bombs or murder people in the streets or lay siege to the home of a teacher falsely accused of damaging a book. Why would any sane person not be afraid of people who carry out these atrocities?

Moderate Muslims really need to stand up and denounce those who are committing these acts whilst shouting Allahu Akbar but we don’t hear them and as I asked above, is it because they are afraid of them or do they tacitly support them?

The other big issue for me is the refusal of large sections of the Muslim population to integrate with the indigenous people of the country. They are the only religious group amongst those mentioned above who do not. Go to Bradford (the city of my birth and childhood) and you will see exactly what I mean. A city where I was threatened by a group of Pakistani youths for accidentally venturing into part of the city which they claimed to be theirs.


I will say it again - your framing is fundamentally prejudiced. I and other Muslims have no obligation to denounce crimes by other people who happen to be share elements of background/ heritage. You would not expect that of other communities.
ANDREW FOSTER
Posted: 11 February 2025 19:47:14(UTC)
#60

Joined: 23/07/2019(UTC)
Posts: 8,124

The KidKad;334003 wrote:


"This country seems to have attracted varieties that are really quite hard line and who many in the world would find it difficult to get along with. Do you accept this or not?"

Please provide evidence before you make such sweeping statements.



It is interesting to note the response of Arab nations to the proposal that they (Jordan, Egypt, Saudi etc. ) should take the 1.7 million Gazans.

They are having none of it by all accounts. They are seeing that group as distinct and different to themselves and (Jordan in particular) are absolutely clear they are not going to take them.

So how would this be different to the UK labelling a whole group and refusing entry?

It seems to be exactly the same approach and atttude that is being suggested in the above post.

So is Jordan being 'racist' in takng this same stance?
The KidKad
Posted: 11 February 2025 20:11:11(UTC)
#61

Joined: 07/08/2019(UTC)
Posts: 37

Thanks: 40 times
Was thanked: 54 time(s) in 26 post(s)
ANDREW FOSTER;334009 wrote:
The KidKad;334003 wrote:


"This country seems to have attracted varieties that are really quite hard line and who many in the world would find it difficult to get along with. Do you accept this or not?"

Please provide evidence before you make such sweeping statements.



It is interesting to note the response of Arab nations to the proposal that they (Jordan, Egypt, Saudi etc. ) should take the 1.7 million Gazans.

They are having none of it by all accounts. They are seeing that group as distinct and different to themselves and (Jordan in particular) are absolutely clear they are not going to take them.

So how would this be different to the UK labelling a whole group and refusing entry?

It seems to be exactly the same approach and atttude that is being suggested in the above post.

So is Jordan being 'racist' in takng this same stance?


Jordan's population is 1/2 to 2/3 of Palestinian descent already so that is quite a ludicrous takeaway in all honesty. The primary reason they are refusing is not wanting to be part of ethnically cleansing a land of its people, and the precedent that would set for more expulsions in the West Bank .Not particularly difficult to understand.

3 users thanked The KidKad for this post.
Newbie on 11/02/2025(UTC), Steve Entwistle on 11/02/2025(UTC), Gary Millar on 13/02/2025(UTC)
ANDREW FOSTER
Posted: 11 February 2025 23:21:44(UTC)
#62

Joined: 23/07/2019(UTC)
Posts: 8,124

The KidKad;334015 wrote:
ANDREW FOSTER;334009 wrote:
The KidKad;334003 wrote:


"This country seems to have attracted varieties that are really quite hard line and who many in the world would find it difficult to get along with. Do you accept this or not?"

Please provide evidence before you make such sweeping statements.



It is interesting to note the response of Arab nations to the proposal that they (Jordan, Egypt, Saudi etc. ) should take the 1.7 million Gazans.

They are having none of it by all accounts. They are seeing that group as distinct and different to themselves and (Jordan in particular) are absolutely clear they are not going to take them.

So how would this be different to the UK labelling a whole group and refusing entry?

It seems to be exactly the same approach and atttude that is being suggested in the above post.

So is Jordan being 'racist' in takng this same stance?


Jordan's population is 1/2 to 2/3 of Palestinian descent already so that is quite a ludicrous takeaway in all honesty. The primary reason they are refusing is not wanting to be part of ethnically cleansing a land of its people, and the precedent that would set for more expulsions in the West Bank .Not particularly difficult to understand.



Fair point.

So I assume you would hold that the UK should refuse any involvement for exactly the same reasons.

2 users thanked ANDREW FOSTER for this post.
Jay P on 11/02/2025(UTC), john brace on 12/02/2025(UTC)
Laurence O'Brien
Posted: 11 February 2025 23:24:14(UTC)
#75

Joined: 04/12/2014(UTC)
Posts: 943

Thanks: 191 times
Was thanked: 1981 time(s) in 650 post(s)
The KidKad;334007 wrote:
Laurence O'Brien;333673 wrote:
There is only one religious group that people fear in the UK and it isn’t Christians, Jews, Hindus, Sikhs or Buddhists. Fear in the sense of a phobia, a word derived from the Greek φοβάμαι - to fear. It’s not hatred in the sense that some would have us believe but a genuine fear of a group of people who plant bombs or murder people in the streets or lay siege to the home of a teacher falsely accused of damaging a book. Why would any sane person not be afraid of people who carry out these atrocities?

Moderate Muslims really need to stand up and denounce those who are committing these acts whilst shouting Allahu Akbar but we don’t hear them and as I asked above, is it because they are afraid of them or do they tacitly support them?

The other big issue for me is the refusal of large sections of the Muslim population to integrate with the indigenous people of the country. They are the only religious group amongst those mentioned above who do not. Go to Bradford (the city of my birth and childhood) and you will see exactly what I mean. A city where I was threatened by a group of Pakistani youths for accidentally venturing into part of the city which they claimed to be theirs.


I will say it again - your framing is fundamentally prejudiced. I and other Muslims have no obligation to denounce crimes by other people who happen to be share elements of background/ heritage. You would not expect that of other communities.


I bloody well would. If crimes were being committed in the name of my god, I would most definitely denounce the perpetrators. The silence speaks volumes.
5 users thanked Laurence O'Brien for this post.
Jay P on 11/02/2025(UTC), Neminem Laedit on 11/02/2025(UTC), Keith Cobby on 12/02/2025(UTC), Robin B on 12/02/2025(UTC), stephen_s on 12/02/2025(UTC)
The KidKad
Posted: 12 February 2025 12:23:36(UTC)
#85

Joined: 07/08/2019(UTC)
Posts: 37

Thanks: 40 times
Was thanked: 54 time(s) in 26 post(s)
Laurence O'Brien;334034 wrote:
The KidKad;334007 wrote:
Laurence O'Brien;333673 wrote:
There is only one religious group that people fear in the UK and it isn’t Christians, Jews, Hindus, Sikhs or Buddhists. Fear in the sense of a phobia, a word derived from the Greek φοβάμαι - to fear. It’s not hatred in the sense that some would have us believe but a genuine fear of a group of people who plant bombs or murder people in the streets or lay siege to the home of a teacher falsely accused of damaging a book. Why would any sane person not be afraid of people who carry out these atrocities?

Moderate Muslims really need to stand up and denounce those who are committing these acts whilst shouting Allahu Akbar but we don’t hear them and as I asked above, is it because they are afraid of them or do they tacitly support them?

The other big issue for me is the refusal of large sections of the Muslim population to integrate with the indigenous people of the country. They are the only religious group amongst those mentioned above who do not. Go to Bradford (the city of my birth and childhood) and you will see exactly what I mean. A city where I was threatened by a group of Pakistani youths for accidentally venturing into part of the city which they claimed to be theirs.


I will say it again - your framing is fundamentally prejudiced. I and other Muslims have no obligation to denounce crimes by other people who happen to be share elements of background/ heritage. You would not expect that of other communities.


I bloody well would. If crimes were being committed in the name of my god, I would most definitely denounce the perpetrators. The silence speaks volumes.


The silence triggers confirmation bias in minds poisoned by years of hateful propaganda.


The KidKad
Posted: 12 February 2025 12:35:34(UTC)
#63

Joined: 07/08/2019(UTC)
Posts: 37

Thanks: 40 times
Was thanked: 54 time(s) in 26 post(s)
ANDREW FOSTER;334033 wrote:
The KidKad;334015 wrote:
ANDREW FOSTER;334009 wrote:
The KidKad;334003 wrote:


"This country seems to have attracted varieties that are really quite hard line and who many in the world would find it difficult to get along with. Do you accept this or not?"

Please provide evidence before you make such sweeping statements.



It is interesting to note the response of Arab nations to the proposal that they (Jordan, Egypt, Saudi etc. ) should take the 1.7 million Gazans.

They are having none of it by all accounts. They are seeing that group as distinct and different to themselves and (Jordan in particular) are absolutely clear they are not going to take them.

So how would this be different to the UK labelling a whole group and refusing entry?

It seems to be exactly the same approach and atttude that is being suggested in the above post.

So is Jordan being 'racist' in takng this same stance?


Jordan's population is 1/2 to 2/3 of Palestinian descent already so that is quite a ludicrous takeaway in all honesty. The primary reason they are refusing is not wanting to be part of ethnically cleansing a land of its people, and the precedent that would set for more expulsions in the West Bank .Not particularly difficult to understand.



Fair point.

So I assume you would hold that the UK should refuse any involvement for exactly the same reasons.



Those people have the rights to self determination and freedom to stay in their land and facilitating expulsion would make us accessory to a breach of the Geneva conventions. The initial Jordanian position (before Trump's threat to withhold aid which makes up a huge chuck of their income) of offering to taking a number of sick (many orphaned) children for treatment given the decimation of healthcare facilities seems a humane, rational response and I do feel there should be some effort made to help them by wealthy outside nations (Arab nations and others). I hope even on here we can agree that treating vulnerable sick children is a good thing to do regardless of creed or colour.
1 user thanked The KidKad for this post.
ANDREW FOSTER on 12/02/2025(UTC)
Robin B
Posted: 12 February 2025 14:50:20(UTC)
#86

Joined: 01/04/2024(UTC)
Posts: 1,523

Thanks: 1519 times
Was thanked: 4639 time(s) in 1247 post(s)
So he has played the race card, even though none of us know him or what his ethnic background is.

He has played the victim card.

Seems to be paranoid and casts aspersions on others, miscontruing what they've actually written.

Only sees things from his own point of view.

Writes off English/British identity and history as 'silly', because it suits him. Self centered and totally disrespectful. Obviously feels emboldened to hold such insulting views thanks to years of propaganda from our appalling, post 1997 political establishment.

Yet, others have a right to self determination in their ancestral lands - doesn't see the staggering irony in this considering his other comments. Inconsistent. Not very logical.

Always has an excuse for those countries or peoples he feels some form of kinship with. Won't tolerate criticism of them, but also maintains the claim that he is at the same time not interested (when the points made are inconvenient). More inconsistency.

I'm noticing similar thinking patterns and rhetoric to the likes of 'Baroness' Warsi, who he previously held up as a voice of wisdom, Humsa Yusef, Naz Shah and Sadiq Khan. Perhaps he has been unduly influenced by these unpleasant and divisive politicians?
3 users thanked Robin B for this post.
stephen_s on 12/02/2025(UTC), john brace on 12/02/2025(UTC), Jay P on 12/02/2025(UTC)
12 Pages«Previous page56789Next page»
+ Reply to discussion

Markets

Other markets