Alanis M;198929 wrote:I see this week's Trust Watch article blames the wide discount on a lack of portfolio transparency / the inability to attribute gains in Nav. Does this really hold back investors / the discount percentage? It seems mad to me how sticky the discount has been on this trust.
thanks for the reference... I hadn't seen it... reposted below...
https://citywire.co.uk/i...ery-renewables/a1595064
Pershing Square Holdings (PSH) shoots close to the top of the risers list this week – pipped only by the winding-up Cambium Global Timberland (TREE) – after the £6.6bn closed-end fund, run by US hedge fund manager Bill Ackman, posted a handy gain in the value of its portfolio.
The sterling-denominated shares notched up a 6.9% gain over five trading days to close at £31.15 on Thursday. While no doubt pleasing for shareholders, who will be hoping there’s more to come given PSH shares’ still cavernous 28% discount to net asset value (NAV),
working out what propelled those gains is not straightforward – much like Ackman’s ongoing adventures with the likes of Spacs, Sparcs and swaptions.
The FTSE 100 investment company, which gives weekly updates to the market on the value of its portfolio, reported NAV per share stood at $57.31 (£43.27) on Tuesday, up nearly 6% in a week for sterling investors.
Universal Music Group, now PSH’s biggest holding by some distance after Ackman snapped up a 10% stake in the process of its spin-out from Vivendi, did make some headway, though its shares have basically traded sideways since its blockbuster September flotation. Pershing Square Tontine, Ackman’s special purpose acquisition company (Spac), to which PSH also has exposure, likewise did little. The Spac, a ‘blank cheque’ vehicle used for taking an as-yet-unknown private company public, is facing a lawsuit, while a potential replacement vehicle (the even more esoteric Sparc) is also awaiting US regulatory approval.
The answer may be simpler: a rebound in the 10-or-so holdings in large North American companies that make up the rest of PSH’s portfolio, many of which are exposed to ups and downs in the real economy. The likes of Burger King-owner Restaurant Brands and hotelier Hilton have bounced back strongly since the sell-off when the omicron coronavirus variant emerged a fortnight ago, while a weakening in the pound has also flattered that effect for UK investors.
Even the exact exposures there are opaque (analysts at Numis recently described the fund’s NAV as ‘somewhat difficult to model’), however, and the difficulty of attributing those gains clearly says something about the persistently wide discount.